You may know him as Taf-kat

“Next to them, piled high, were the many CD’s filled to bursting with my precious pictures, tens of thousands of them, all kinds, from innocent, fully clothed girls, through posed nudity, to the hardest cp you can imagine. Like the books, I was so familiar with every single image, they had been sorted and re-sorted, into age order, into filename order, all the series sorted, my favourite folder, my pigtails folder, my blow-job folder…if there was a different way to sort them, I had done it.”

That’s Taf-kat. He told this story of his child pornography conviction and his obsession, one which continues to this day.

Meet John Hodgson

You may know him as

Taf-kat
and
Princesplaff

According to his wiki entry:

“He has been arrested and convicted for possession of child pornography twice, once in 2000, and another time in 2006.

He also collects pictures of little girls from people’s family galleries online, and harrasses them with lewd comments about their children and relatives.”

Re: Try WebShots.com
Posted by princesplaff on Friday, April 25 2003 at 07:39:31pm

OK. Click on “community” the “family & friends”, best sections are babies, birthdays, and holidays. Click to sort by date to get the newest listed first, rather than the most popular, as the popular ones tend to be women in bikinis, yuk.
A link below will give you a good one.
I am now a Webshots member (£5 a year) and I have a list of “favourite members” that keeps emptying my tissue box.

Read more about pedophiles who steal your personal family photos for perverted reasons HERE

Re: Am I the only NON-adult-attracted one here?
Posted by princesplaff on Saturday, January 18 2003 at 04:44:19am

You are not alone. I am attracted to 3-9 lg’s. You have my exact aoa! Although I am different as I have been married and had a family. I agree with you that as soon as any breasts appear (or hair down there) I completely lose interest. Lowering the age limit to 12 would help, assuming me, a 47 year old overweight git, could pull a 12 year old, but even then as I lay with her I would be fantasizing about her being younger…that is why, since my marriage fell apart in 1999 when I was outed as a gl, I have become celibate, not out of choice, but if I was to pursue a girl I was attracted to, I would be locked up.

Then wander on over and take a look at Taf-kat and his twisted ‘passion’ on his Wikisposure site. Don’t miss his poetry for a glimpse into the mind of a “childlover”

Graphics courtesy of Jacey

Who is Sarah Tofte?

Meet
Terri Lynn Winchell

Have you heard of her?
Or has her name been lost and overshadowed
by the name of the man who murdered her.

On January 8, 1981, Michael Morales strangled her with his belt until it broke. He then hit her in the head with a hammer 23 times, dragged her across a road face down and raped her, finishing off his work by stabbing her in the chest 4 times.

Terri was 17 years old.

For this Morales was sentenced to die. But Sarah Tofte, a “researcher” for Human Rights Watch argued that lethal injection was “cruel and unusual” punishment. Sarah as a student and prison activist once argued for reform. “My heart recoils within me; my compassion grows warm and tender.”

I imagine with that mindset she would be very interested in reforming sex offender laws also. She identifies with the offender. She authored No Easy Answers: Sex Offender Laws in the US

This 146-page report is the first comprehensive study of US sex offender policies, their public safety impact, and the effect they have on former offenders and their families. During two years of investigation for this report, Human Rights Watch researchers conducted over 200 interviews with victims of sexual violence and their relatives, former offenders, law enforcement and government officials, treatment providers, researchers, and child safety advocates.

“Politicians didn’t do their homework before enacting these sex offender laws. Instead they have perpetuated myths about sex offenders and failed to deal with the complex realities of sexual violence against children.”

“Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world.We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice.

We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable.”
Let’s look at some of the recommendations made in this report and then we’ll look at what kind of “homework” and research Sarah Tofte did in this “report” sponsored by Human Rights Watch.

Here’s a sampling of recommendations:

• Accountability for those who search online databases should be ensured by requiring the database user to specify the purpose for the search, and to provide his or her name and zip code
• eliminate public access to online registries of sex offenders
• Congress should eliminate public access to the national sex offender registry
• Law enforcement officials should eliminate the use of posters, flyers, and other easily replicable materials to alert communities of the presence of a registered sex offender in their neighborhood
• Access to sex offender registries should be limited to law enforcement
• Former offenders should not be required to register with their schools or places of employment
• No offender who was under the age of 18 at the time of his or her offense should be required to register
• All provisions of the Adam Walsh Act that deal with state registration and community notification requirements should be repealed
• If Congress does not repeal the Adam Walsh Act requirements as they pertain to state registration and community notification, states should not adopt the Adam Walsh Act provisions to their registration and community notification laws
• Neither states nor localities should have residency restriction laws that apply to entire classes of former offenders

It sounds just like the petition to free sex offenders from accountability and abolish age of consent laws, doesn’t it? We wrote about that here and here and the issue was wiki’d here.

“Human Rights Watch appreciates the sense of concern and urgency that has prompted these laws. They reflect a deep public yearning for safety in a world that seems increasingly threatening. Every child has the right to live free from violence and sexual abuse. Promoting public safety by holding offenders accountable and by instituting effective crime prevention measures is a core governmental obligation.

Unfortunately, our research reveals that sex offender registration, community notification, and residency restriction laws are ill-considered, poorly crafted, and may cause more harm than good

The evidence is overwhelming, as detailed in this report, that these laws cause great harm to the people subject to them”

So now let’s look at her overwhelming evidence. And where she got it. Some of the people included Zman, Daniel Chenault, Johnny Ray Lee, Butch Brown and of course Linda Pehrson. We know Linda from her previous news interview “Just call me Susie” and her inclusion in the audio portion of Sarah’s “report”. You see, Linda’s husband molested her daughter, after serving time in prison Linda let him come back into the home. Linda aka Amy says

I think my daughter’s very strong. I was a battered women’s counselor, for about eight years, and I’m about the strongest woman you’ll ever meet, so it’s not that I’m a weak woman, and I’m a standing by my man kind of gal, cause I’m not, I want to give my daughter all the tools and techniques she needs to empower her to get on with her life, I don’t want her to be a professional victim the rest of her life. I don’t want this to define her.

So Linda Pehrson is a woman who not only stayed with the man who did this to her child, his step-daughter, but advocates bringing children’s abusers back into their home with the jazzed up term ‘family reunification’. Is this where Sarah got her information?

We know that she wrote to Linda asking for very specific information. In other words she solicited the responses that she wanted. She asked for people who had been victims of vigilantism, she asked for people who were victims of ‘restrictive laws’, she asked for people who had notification cards. She focused on the states that had the most strict SOR guidelines. She knew the answers she wanted and that’s what she set out to get.

This is not a ‘study’ this is mere journalism. Spin doctored to suit her purpose. She says that in researching this issue she interviewed “122 sex offenders and 90 of their loved ones……and a number of victims” I would like to know how many victims she interviewed …..that weren’t also offenders.

It seems she put a lot of weight on the information she got from Linda Pehrson.

Human Rights Watch Needs You

Here is a message from Human Right Watch PLEASE contact them!! Her email is toftes@…

Hi Linda. My name is Sarah. I am a researcher with Human Rights Watch. I am working on a report on sex offender laws, and how they affect convicted sex offenders and their loved ones. We received your e-mail to Human Rights Watch, and I was hoping I might be able to speak with you by phone about your experiences.

Take care,

Sarah

****
Sarah Tofte

Human Rights Watch, U.S. Program

350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor

New York, NY 10118

Ph: 212.377.9408

Fx: 212.736.1300

I also was wondering if you have ever seen any good statistics on how many acts of vigilante violence were committed against sex offenders?

Can anyone help Sarah from Human Rights Watch with the info she needs? She is working hard for us! Linda

———- Forwarded Message ———-

Hi Linda! I have been in touch with a number of individuals in Georgia and Iowa about the effect zoning laws had on their lives. I understand there are sex offender zoning laws in at least 14 states. I was wondering if you have been in touch with others in states outside of Georgia or Iowa that have been affected by zoning laws.

Take care,

Sarah

Our report is looking less at the propriety of charging juveniles with sex offenses (although we think it is wrong) as much as we are looking at the consequences of sex offender laws

To support our research, we are attempting to locate sex offenders who are struggling to live under restrictive laws. Because Georgia has one of the most exclusive zoning laws in the country, we are focusing on the experiences of sex offenders in Georgia

Your help will be invaluable in our efforts to ensure justice and fair treatment for sex offenders in the U.S. and their families

Re: [roar_4_freedom] Human Rights Organization Begins Investigation of U.S. Sex Offender

The report should be coming out SOON! I was interviewed for this report as well as having a hand behind the scenes helping Sarah Tofte of HRW with the research and contacts. I know of some others here were interviewed as well

Linda

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Sarah Tofte
Date: Oct 12, 2007 5:51 PM
Subject: Huffington Post post
To: Linda Pehrson

Hi Linda. I know you will distribute far and wide. Urge people to comment.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sarah-tofte/sex-offender-laws-may-do-_b_68261.html

I have been working with Sarah since last summer.Her report is going to be complete. I know that for a fact because, I sent her contacts for EVERY aspect of this issue. If she needed people, stats, research and news articles, I was more than happy to help every step of the way!
Linda

HERE we talked about what distorted statistics these people use. The eadvocate website that takes legitimate statistics and twists them and inserts the results of one question into the answer of another. And lo and behold, who did Sarah Tofte reference as one of her sources for this monstrosity she’s trying to pass off as ‘legitimate research’? None other than eadvocate. In fact the very page she references is one with nothing but defense of pedophilia, denial of the grooming process, and attempts to deceive regarding pedophiles, child molesters and sex offenders in general. Some of the things the blame gamers have to say about eadvocate include

Cheryl: Harvard, Have you looked at the charts on Eadvocate?

Harvard: I’m looking at the tables on eadvocate and turning those into charts. I’m also culling data from various reports

TimF: Harvard, One of my favorite stats is: “96.5% of *new sex offenses* are committed by someone who has never committed a sex offense before!”

Linda Pehrson and Cheryl Griffith aka ‘equaljustice2’ hijacked Shirley Lowery’s SOSEN organization which created a big stir. Zman aka Michael Gregg got all agitated and Betty Price tried to calm him down. It is here that we learn more about Sarah

“Linda and Cheryl have great connections and talk to reporters, Sarah Tofte communicates with sosen on a regular basis. I could go on and on. Staff is organized. We have a great WORKING staff. And boy do they work. They get the same pay as you and me. Dedicated staff, Zman and this is all coming together

The Ohio Rally, both Linda and Cheryl are speakers, Don’t tell anybody, but they have are approaching Sarah Tofte to speak at the Rally. There is a big question as to whether her being associated with sex offender advocacy groups might conflict with her position with HRW. I can see a conflict myself. It might be detrimental to the organization.

I said all that to say this. It is VITAL to all sex offender advocacy groups to get it together. No fighting on line. Getting serious about the work we do and and don’t allow for anyone to be divisive. It hurts the cause. Big Time.”

Indeed.
Graphics courtesy of Jacey

Kamikaze Jan

Jan Kruska says

“hate doesn’t solve anything, neither does revenge. Hate and vengeance is for the simple minded and it is a cop out. It is taking the easy way out. It is also the fast track to the inevitable next future disaster”

So what’s so wrong about that statement? Jan only applies it to people who have sexually offended against others. That’s what.
Jan believes:

“While sexual abuse is despicable there are indeed things that are much worse in life”

“those on the sex offender registry have suffered great losses…….the right to live where you want and feel safe in your person and in your home”

“The scarlett [sic] letter is real and is about to be placed squarely on the foreheads of those responsible for this American travesty that is the sex offender registry”

Jan also believes that children don’t report when they are abused for fear that their abuser will be removed from the home.

It reminded me so much of someone else. The wacked out mother who showed up on GirlChat recently explaining that her boyfriend got together with her because he was a pedophile and wanted her daughter. He had done it to another woman and her daughter before her. And now after molesting the 10 year old, Frianne is trying to figure out how to hold on to him when he gets out of jail. OMG They all seem to be the same! Look at this grandma, she’s upset that her son is in jail. she admits that he did it but says “it was a psychological error on his part” She goes on to say that

“I know he is sorry and will never do it again….He should not have to pay so dearly, he did’nt kill …and it was the result of the two girls(his) constantly sexually active since 11, and flaunting it in his face, when his wife did’nt like sex, he was in need”

She just fit right into that den at SOSEN didn’t she? Even Shirley Lowery agrees as a matter of fact

“I grew up in an abusive home and I kept my mouth shut. Now that I am older and wiser I know without a doubt that I did the right thing then and would do the same again. Virtue has little meaning to a child who likes a roof over their head and food to put in their belly”

But then what can you expect, as she also said:

Poor Pathetic Ignorant Americans

John Walsh has single-handedly destroyed more US children than any other individual in history

Americans can be incredibly stupid.

The Miami police department has set the stage. No action was required but their reaction equaled that of a national crisis. The public has a right to know

John Walsh is not the only person to lose a child under tragic circumstances. He has been in a rage for a quarter of a century. Now we are being asked to pick up an astronomical tab to immortalize his son. I wouldn’t give a dime. I learned what manure is a long time ago so I walk around it rather than stepping in it.

Each of us has the capability of being an abuser and many thousands of you are active abusers. How dare you sit back and point your finger and judge yourself as being a better person. You aren’t.

Home of the brave? No, a nation of whimps whose answer to everything is placing the blame elsewhere.

All that talk about blaming and finger pointing led me back a ways. I thought about Jan’s religious intolerance. And I thought about her dishonesty and her belief that parents of murdered children are the ones who should be blamed rather than the person who commits the act.

“The common thread with all of these cases is that the parents were living less than, shall we say, good moral lifestyles…..”Sex offenders aren’t born sex offenders. They are created. They are a bi-product of society and the sooner we ALL start taking responsibility the better chance we all have of protecting our kids and having, NO MORE VICTIMS

I believe that these people, the Shirley Lowery’s and Jan Kruska’s and Tom Madison’s don’t know what responsibility is. Tom as CEO of SoClear believes it’s appropriate behavior for a representative of his organization in response to commentary about them to attack random uninvolved people by libeling them and accusing them of things which they did not do. He even goes so far as to demean the serious topic of child sexual abuse by calling Jan’s actions a game of “sticks ‘n stones”.

The mainstream perception that these people are indifferent and insensitive to the very real abuse that children have suffered is born out by their own actions and I believe there could hardly be a more blatant example of their remarkable unwillingness to take responsibility for their own actions. We have dubbed this ‘blame gaming’ but a more proper term would be sociopathic.

And yet, we aren’t the only ones bickering with these guys. We aren’t the only ones who think these people are wack jobs. Take the case of Erika

p3rl_script wrote to David Coffman, owner of SOSEN about her concerns regarding CEO Shirley Lowery.

“I have decided to withdraw my membership from SOSEN as a result of Shirley’s destructive messages and psychotic leadership skills.

She is hurting people and she will drag you and others down with her if allowed to continue, she is severely unstable mentally and has no understanding just how damaging her behavior is when she is allowed to continue inciting nonsense with no consequences for her asinine actions.”

And to Shirley herself she says: “Your one step away from having the FBI on your tail, with the type of content your allowing to be posted and the type of things you write about.

I cannot and will not be associated with the “Illegal” and “unlawful” type of activity your advocating for by encouraging and promoting it on your Yahoo Group SOSEN.

It is extremely stupid and you are placing any one in connection with you and SOSEN in danger of being arrested for whatever the government can get you for in regards to inciting people and encouraging illegal activity in violation of both state and federal laws.

The kind of behavior you are promoting and allowing to occur is EXTREMELY dangerous and self-defeating and I shall take NO part in it.

You have no idea (seemingly) of the harm and damage your doing to the very people you think you are helping! Your like a predator who preys on peoples fears causing them to react.

FOR THE RECORD I AM NO LONGER A MEMBER SOSEN YAHOO GROUPS! AND I DO NOT ENGAGE IN ILLEGAL ACTIVITY”

Erika promptly formed the Families in Social Crisis Legal Defense group.

But she also formed a yahoo group called jessicamarielunsfordfoundation

Using this name she wrote propaganda

and wild rants to newspaper articles

 

 

 

 

 

She told us about her past

 

And linked us to her MySpace

And her profession

 

 

 

 

And her hobbies

Her needs

The Results

Her associations

All of us here at AZ and in the entire Anti community each have our own reasons for being here. Some of us were sexually abused as children or know someone who was. Some of us came to this due to attacks by online pedophile terrorists. But the common thread that binds us is the obligation we feel.

When someone like a Margie Slagle Ohio Attorney and board member of SoClear mocks sexual child abuse via harassing emails, or when a Jan Kruska mocks a child sexual abuse survivor, some of us just shake our heads in disbelief as they watch her downward spiral. Others say “this will never do”

Meet Kamikaze Jan

 

HT Jacey

Jack Is Back — Sort Of

Remember our good pal Jack McClellan?

Sadly, a Los Angeles judge has decided that Jack must stay away from certain delineated spots in Southern California. Poor Jack! What’s a McClellan to do now?

Oh no! He has decided to leave the Great State of Fornicalia! Zounds!

LOS ANGELES (AP) – A self-described pedophile is leaving California after a judge ordered him to stay away permanently from places where children gather, the man told a TV station for a report that aired Sunday.

“I have to leave the state, really, I can’t live here under this Orwellian protocol,” Jack McClellan told KABC. “It’s nightmarish.”

McClellan did not say where he planned to go, and he did not immediately return a message left on his cell phone by The Associated Press.

McClellan has been unemployed and living out of his car since arriving in Southern California this summer from Washington.

McClellan, 45, came to the attention of authorities for a Web site where he posted photos of children in public places and discussed how he liked to stake out parks, public libraries, fast-food restaurants and other areas where little girls congregated. His Internet service provider took down his Web site more than a month ago.

Who knows where poor Jack will go now? And the horrible order handed down by the oppressive judge? It reads like this:

But on Friday, Superior Court Judge Melvin Sandvig issued a permanent injunction and a three-year restraining order that prohibits McClellan from coming within 30 feet of schools, playgrounds and other places where children congregate.

The judge’s ruling narrowed an injunction issued earlier in the month that barred McClellan from coming near anyone under age 18 anywhere in the state. McClellan spent 10 days in jail for violating that injunction when he was arrested earlier this month near a child care center at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Sandvig’s new ruling also bars McClellan from contacting, videotaping or photographing children or publishing their photos without written consent from a guardian or parent. McClellan could be arrested if he violates that prohibition.

I really don’t think ol’ Jack will be able to comply with this order; hence, his decision to leave my state. Poor, poor Jack!

Where will he go? What shall he do?

Well — since AZ is all about any and all Orwellian Protocols, howzabout some “additional information” about Jackie Baby. Here’s what he looks like:

Jack McClellan is 45 years old, 6’1″ and 195 pounds.

He drives a blue-colored 1993 Ford Escort, two-door, with Washington license plate 915WEX.

Kinda like Where’s Waldo? — where shall Jack Go Next?

What do you think?

BZ

Jan’s Truth

Jan is upset over her own truth.

Jan set out to destroy us and she pointed the finger at the wrong person. Poor Carolyn!

Watch Jan the fluff n stuffed get puffed and qwack up!

We’re sending it ALL back around!

Enjoy!!

Blame Gaming

– It’s what maladjusted sex offenders do when they’re not in prison. According to Jan Kruska, Child Molesters and Abusers aren’t actually to blame for cases of sexual abuse – the parents of the victims, the government in general and everyone else in society are what’s responsible.

Also did you know that any country which punishes criminals for commiting crimes, constitutes as a police state?

Nuh, neither did we.

But you don’t have to take my word for it, listen to Jan herself as she raps it all out – telling it like it is.

div.fetish object, div.fetish embed {width:300px;height:320px;visibility:visible;z-index:5;}div.fetish div.fetishButton {display:block;position:relative;top:-35px;z-index:6;text-align:center;}div.fetish div.fetishButton img {border-style:none;border-width:0px;}

01. Police State – Jan educates us about common sense and the fact that the Police State we live in should turn a blind eye to people who sexually abuse children because the world isn’t our babysitter. Most importantly she lets us know how important she is in the struggle to keep children safe from child predators. We can NOT depend on Amanda Rogers.

02. Lewd Behavior – Jan “Concerned for the truth” Kruska AKA Amanda Rogers talks about how no one should have the right to know if George Edenfield’s living next door.

03. Stand by your Child Molesting Man – Jan feels qualified to speak on behalf of the victims of child sexual abuse saying that the reason why sexual abuse is so under-reported isn’t because the victims feel so deeply hurt by their abuse that they’d rather not re-live it again through painful court processes, but because they’re worried that the abuser will wind up listed as a registered sex offender, Oh and let’s not forget ‘he might not do it again.’

Who is this woman?

Who is Jan Kruska, AKA Amanda Rogers, AKA Jan Gustafson, AKA Jan Nelson? We wrote about her here We wrote about her activities regarding sex offender reform and her ideas about sex offenders.

Jan of course is angry about being exposed and says she’s worried about her own children being humiliated because of this. But once again that is just another step in the blame game.

SHE is the only one to blame for her activities. And why does she want to protect her own children while throwing everyone else’s literally to the wolves?

Her advocation of sweeping reform which would essentially abolish all punishment for child molesters AND even remove laws which make their activities illegal can be seen as nothing less than child endangerment.

Jan likes attention and she has definitely made the news now. Check it out and read for yourself about her other activities. Does anyone remember what happened the last two times a new wiki entry was released at Corporatesexoffenders.com? I do, we wrote about them here and here
What is Jan’s reaction to this you might wonder? Well, this person who calls herself a REFORMED sex offender….has lashed out at an innocent person in her haste to take down Stitches.

She’s made herself a webpage outing someone as me. She’s digging into her personal life. She’s doing this with malicious intent to bring harm to this person. Tell me Jan, how does it make you feel to be gloating over exposing someone’s LEGAL activities, especially when that person had never even heard your name before. When that person was not in any way involved in anti-pedophilia activism or Absolute Zero United for that matter.

I messaged Jan not once, but twice telling her she had the wrong person. The person she’s attacking has contacted her also. All to no avail. So you may ask yourself why? Why would Jan try to wreak havoc on an uninvolved party this way? I suppose we could give the easy answer that she’s obviously not very bright. This is thoroughly documented already in her prolific writings and frenzied hatred for child advocates.

We saw her sarcasm, her mocking hostility toward parents of brutally murdered children. What else is she capable of? But I think it goes even deeper than all that. Jan has her head set on it, you see. It doesn’t matter if the info is accurate or not. Jan believes it, and to Jan that’s all that matters. She’s cognitively distorted, and in her attempt to rip up someone’s life she’s hurting herself far more than any of us ever could.

Besides the uninvolved person she has attacked, Jan is going to have to live with the damage she has caused this person, this person who is not me. This person who was out busy living life unaware of people like Jan. JAN is solely responsible for her own actions.

I called Jan a Fluff n’ Stuff. Jan proved it was true.

Fluff n’ Stuff

Amanda Rogers, as she likes to call herself, describes herself as

a freelance investigative journalist from Phoenix,AZ.

She is a human rights, civil rights, and child safety advocate, as well as a political ball buster. Amanda is the author of numerous articles and video blogs. Her articles and editorials have been published in news magazines both nationally and across the globe

Amanda writes for American Chronicle, an online tabloid type website. She’s also on the board of SoClear a pro sex offender rights organization which describes her this way:

Fed up with the barrage of blatantly unconstitutional and ineffective legislation regarding sex offenders and so-called “child protection”, Ms. Rogers has made it her mission to educate the public on the truth behind the headlines: To cut through the hype and spin to bring you the facts, un-tethered by political bias, affiliations, or agendas. It is only through truths, however painful, infuriating or embarrassing that real discussion on these issues can begin and effective changes be made.

Amanda believes that society is demonizing sex offenders. She believes we are mistreating them. She believes we are thus endangering children. She is an activist. Her issue is to reform sex offender laws. She supports the petition we wrote about HERE.

Amanda claims that that only 3% of sex offenders recidivate. She bases that on the 1994 DOJ report regarding recidivism rates of sex offenders. Then, in typical Lindsay Ashford style, she subtracts the number of those offenders in that study who were reconvicted within a 3 year period from 100% and erroneously concludes that it must mean 97% of sex offense cases are committed by someone never before convicted of a sex crime. WA LA She’s using this insane conclusion to promote abolishment of sex offender registries, life imprisonment sentences and age of consent laws.

When we very helpfully pointed out to her that studies done over a much longer period of time found that the offender didn’t typically start to re-offend until 5 years post release from prison, which would actually make this DOJ statistic a moot point, she very typically deleted our comments and proceeded to harass a CSA survivor. Wouldn’t want people to know the truth now would she?

Amanda wants this

Abolish all provisions of state and Federal sex offender registries.. There should be no internet or other public posting of the identity, photograph, address, workplace or personal information of any offender

Whose side is she on again? She believes you don’t have a right to know that Joe next door raped a 5 year old child………when you have a 5 year old child.

She also makes note, as do all these activists that there are very few sex crimes committed by those on the sex offender registry and in some insane twist of logic concludes that WA LA we don’t need one. Whereas I’m saying it may just be working. In cases where the offender was registered but they weren’t adequately followed by law enforcement, she concludes that we are wasting money on the SOR, whereas I believe we need to invest more money into it and ensure that all agencies have the staff and resources they need.

At one point she becomes so bold as to say that the reason for widespread under-reporting of child sexual abuse is because people know that bad stuff is gonna happen when they report it. For example prison sentences, SOR, possibly the breadwinner being removed from the home. Whereas if there were no punishment for sex offenders and it wasn’t something required by law to be reported, well then the victim could just gently guide the offender on down to the corner therapist and WA LA problem would be solved. She doesn’t understand sex offenders much does she?

I should say not. But I would like to ask her why she blames Adam Walsh’s mother for the actions of the man who cut off Adam’s head. And why she blames the family of Christopher Barrios and the entire system for the actions of the gruesome twosome who raped and murdered him while that hag looked on getting her jollies.

“Little Christopher paid the price for this ill thought out legislation with his very life. It is the opinion of this writer that lawmakers have just as much blood on their hands as the Edenfields themselves”

She refers to Mark Klass, Mark Lundsford, John Walsh as the flock of vultures. And addressing the issue of Megan Kanka (Megans Law) and the man who raped and murdered her (a convicted sex offender) she says that law enforcement knew he was dangerous and yet they let him out anyway. Well oh me oh my, if you really feel that way Amanda, why do you support doing away with all life imprisonment sentences for sex offenders? Why?

Why are you addressing the parents of murdered children with scorn and hostility in your voice? Why are you trying to dig up dirt on them? You wouldn’t be the judgmental type now would you? You wouldn’t be one to try and legislate morality now would you? You wouldn’t make a statement like: “The common thread with all of these cases is that the parents were living less than, shall we say, good moral lifestyles…..” And why are you blaming everyone, everyone for the deaths of Dylan Groene, Jessica Lunsford, Megan Kanka, Adam Walsh, Carly Brucia, and Danielle Van Dam except the men who actually committed the acts? Yes, Amanda, as parents we have to take care of our children, but when you said:

“This world is not your babysitter”

All I could think was……..Am I my brother’s keeper? And in this case, Amanda, yes yes yes I am. When it comes to children we all are. If you don’t agree then I would imagine you perhaps have ulterior motives for this cause of yours?

Amanda believes that teenagers are the victims in this modern day hysterical witch hunt. To solve that problem she supports this:

De-criminalize all consensual sexual activities among teenagers

She draws no line. A 19 year old 11 month and 29 day old person would be exempt from being prosecuted for having sex with a 13 year old and 1 day old child. Oh! But she did use the word consensual. As if she believes the 13 year old is capable of making a rational decision about sexual activity with the 19/20 year old. I guess she does believe it.

But on the other hand she DID say she was against pedophiles and so I’m just scratching my head here. WTF? Because you see what this petition says is

Stop public vilification and demonization of sex offenders. Oppose the use in the media or by public officials of obviously pejorative language with regard to offenders. Use of the term “pedophile” should be extremely limited and accurate. Children should be defined as persons under the age of puberty.

Ok, there is the definition of child that she supports. But then how do you explain this?

Support broad sex education for children, and empower them to make their own decisions and stand up for their rights

THAT right there is an advocation for abolishment of age of consent laws, and the typical pedophile movement’s modus operandi. Turn it on the child. Make THEM responsible for what the adults want to do to them.

And like we said before, this reform petition is about removing all punishments for sex offenders, placing the responsibility for CSA on the child, and removing restrictions for pedophiles. I think Amanda’s a malicious LIAR whose attempts to manipulate public opinion with false propaganda are on the lines of reckless endangerment.

And they call us ignorant and uneducated? Well, Amanda did. But then I think she has more hair than brains. In fact I just call her fluff n’ stuff.

Jan Elizabeth Kruska describes herself as

a freelance journalist from Phoenix, Arizona U.S.A.

She is the author of numerous articles, live concert reviews, and musician interviews which have been published both nationally and internationally. Jan also does live concert photography which helps to bring the stories and reviews together for both readers and fans.

Please see her website for more information and concert photos at http://www.rhythmnation.biz

Jan Kruska is a registered sex offender herself you see. Jan is Amanda. Jan has ulterior motives behind her numerous pro sex abuse articles, and her website and her organization of the rally in Miami and her support of this horrendous excuse for a petition that claims it is “part of the effort to support the happiness, well-being and freedom of children”

I did find it quite interesting that this petition which states:

We call on those who agree with us to sign our Call publicly, with full disclosure of real identity

And Jan did that. Yes indeed she did. The strange thing is that she also signed Amanda’s name. You know, the Amanda who doesn’t even exist?

I don’t know about you, but I would sort of think that a reformed sex offender wouldn’t stoop to lying now would they? And if they did…..which activities of theirs should we believe in and which ones should we question? As for me I don’t believe anything she has to say.

Graphics provided by Jacey

Therapy for Jack

Perhaps that’s the answer to this public menace known as Jack McClellan?

After all he did say it himself

“I thought it was the best
therapeutic thing for my own head
to kind of put this out there,
what I’m thinking”

Isn’t that what all perverts say?
What’s the best thing for me.

Me. me. me.

According to pedophiles if society doesn’t give them what they want……well, I’m sure you’ve heard it all before. “They’ll feel oppressed and act out and rape a child.” Or maybe “They’ll go underground where you can’t watch them.” Or how about “They’ll be miserable at not being able to exploit children and rise up against those children.” Blah blah blah

Personally I’m sick of hearing it.

I’m sick of the incessant whining they do about their needs not being met.

How it’s society’s fault. Oh and how we’re all Nazi’s and haters and idiots.

They don’t have a lick of sense. I’ve tried to always prove my points with reason and logic. I’m through with the scumbags. And they are.

Every last one of them. Look at this face. Look at those eyes. Can you even begin to imagine what’s going on in that little pedo brain of his? This nasty filthy attention seeking pervert. Jack and his pedopals won’t show respect for children? Then they deserve none and that’s exactly what I’m going to give them.

Or as the infamous albertRoss of the Canadian hovel once said

“If they don’t give me respect…I’ll just send it ALL back around”

Don’t Go!!

Don’t go Descartes, you were my only friend. ):

Oh Descartes, really I just feel so bad. Like perhaps I may have contributed to this.

And seriously Descartes I wish you wouldn’t go. I mean you were my only friend ):

Well except for sans25 (but that’s another story)

Oh and Santi of course (but that doesn’t count) so Descartes please DON’T GO!! Don’t do it, don’t, no!!!!