While this site is under construction – here is the disclaimer for our site. In the future it will be provided as a link.
The information in this blog is ‘as is’ and confers no rights. This is a blog not a commercial enterprise. Information provided by the authors is opinion unless otherwise stated. We invite comment and opinion, discussion and information sharing. We do not expect everyone to agree with what we write but we do expect the following standards:
- Respectful communication – flamers will be summarily deleted.
- Any attempt to justify paedophilia or other exploitation of children or any attempt to rationalise these actions will be deleted
- You are reading this of your own choice – if you don’t like it GO AWAY
- Any and all threats of violence against the authors or their families will be treated as serious and law enforcement will be notified (you are not as hard to find as you think)
The authors are busy people, who don’t have time to moderate and would like to consider that literate responsible adults who wish to comment will follow the rules set out above. We have a delete button and we are not afraid to use it.
We hold no responsibility for content or products contained on external sites to which we have linked.
Well put, and the fact that you’re willing to hear alternate viewpoints on this blog at all is certainly positive.
But I think you will have to clarify your “Any attempt to justify paedophilia or other exploitation of children or any attempt to rationalise these actions will be deleted”
I’m not trying to protect pedophiles, but rather explain why it is problematic.
What exactly qalifies trying to “justify pedophilia”? It’s a fact that pedophilia exists, and obviously they will want to make their side of the story heard. If you don’t want to see any posts supporting pedophiles on this blog, then you should say so.
As for child abuse, pro-childlove activists generally believe abuse and coercion of children for any agenda is bad, but that a consentual sexual relationship with a child is not necessarily abusive. They believe that most of the damage done to a child is actually caused by the social stigma surrounding the issue. Hence many disapprove of sexual relationships in the current state of affairs.
Comment by void — June 11, 2006 @ 3:46 pm
Well put, and the fact that you’re willing to hear alternate viewpoints on this blog at all is certainly positive.
But I think you will have to clarify your “Any attempt to justify paedophilia or other exploitation of children or any attempt to rationalise these actions will be deleted”
I’m not trying to protect pedophiles, but rather explain why it is problematic.
What exactly qalifies trying to “justify pedophilia”? It’s a fact that pedophilia exists, and obviously they will want to make their side of the story heard. If you don’t want to see any posts supporting pedophiles on this blog, then you should say so.
As for child abuse, pro-childlove activists generally believe abuse and coercion of children for any agenda is bad, but that a consentual sexual relationship with a child is not necessarily abusive. They believe that most of the damage done to a child is actually caused by the social stigma surrounding the issue. Hence many disapprove of sexual relationships in the current state of affairs.
Comment by void — June 11, 2006 @ 3:46 pm
Void said: If you don’t want to see any posts supporting pedophiles on this blog, then you should say so.
I am pretty sure we did,several times
Comment by Hellpig — June 11, 2006 @ 8:05 pm
Void said: If you don’t want to see any posts supporting pedophiles on this blog, then you should say so.
I am pretty sure we did,several times
Comment by Hellpig — June 11, 2006 @ 8:05 pm
As for child abuse, pro-childlove activists generally believe abuse and coercion of children for any agenda is bad, but that a consentual sexual relationship with a child is not necessarily abusive.
Children consensual? This belief is one of the problems here.
Comment by Stitches77 — June 11, 2006 @ 8:23 pm
As for child abuse, pro-childlove activists generally believe abuse and coercion of children for any agenda is bad, but that a consentual sexual relationship with a child is not necessarily abusive.
Children consensual? This belief is one of the problems here.
Comment by Stitches77 — June 11, 2006 @ 8:23 pm
Children are unable to have a ‘consenting’ sexual relationship with an adult. Consent is always coerced, by use of positive or negative reinforcement. ie the child learns that to get what they want, money, gifts, attention etc, they have to give the adult what they want, their innocence.
My point will become invalid the day we see children campaigning as hard as these paedophiles, to be able to have these ‘consenting’ sexual relationships with adults.
Comment by Serai — June 11, 2006 @ 11:00 pm
Children are unable to have a ‘consenting’ sexual relationship with an adult. Consent is always coerced, by use of positive or negative reinforcement. ie the child learns that to get what they want, money, gifts, attention etc, they have to give the adult what they want, their innocence.
My point will become invalid the day we see children campaigning as hard as these paedophiles, to be able to have these ‘consenting’ sexual relationships with adults.
Comment by Serai — June 11, 2006 @ 11:00 pm
Hellpig:
Actually, no, it hasn’t been stated anywhere on this blog or the comments, apart from this particular quote in the “Disclaimer” article that I asked to clarify.
I made the (apparently incorrect) assmuption that “inviting opinion and discussion” would also apply to opinions that conflicted with yours.
Comment by void — June 11, 2006 @ 11:49 pm
Hellpig:
Actually, no, it hasn’t been stated anywhere on this blog or the comments, apart from this particular quote in the “Disclaimer” article that I asked to clarify.
I made the (apparently incorrect) assmuption that “inviting opinion and discussion” would also apply to opinions that conflicted with yours.
Comment by void — June 11, 2006 @ 11:49 pm
Void in my first post I said it twice
Comment by Hellpig — June 12, 2006 @ 12:20 am
Void in my first post I said it twice
Comment by Hellpig — June 12, 2006 @ 12:20 am