Remsen Benedict AKA Wolfman the Bus driver

corporatesexoffenders.com strikes again with it’s second arrest in the last week.

Last week it was Jim Finn AKA Jimf3

Today we have Wolfman a school bus driver, Boy Scouts leader and pedophile.

Wolfman has stated that he meets his ‘young friends’ through scouting and frequently discusses how attracted he is to different boys on the school bus he drives.

“For me it is the prepube charature that attracts me. I like the small skinny figure with little or no hair. Their mind has an inocense to it.”

52 year old Remsen McGinnis Benedict of Novato, California was arrested today on child pornography charges after authorities were alerted to his wikisposure article.

Needless to say the Boy Scouts are none to happy with him. Let alone the school. Or the parents, or the authorities for that matter.

“We have four computers that were taken from his residence,” Laveroni added. “There was a quantity of digital images that led to his arrest.”Laveroni wouldn’t say how many pornographic digital images were found, but he said the number was high enough to have Benedict’s bail “enhanced” to $500,000.” SOURCE

“The investigation began when police received an e-mail July 26 from the Novato Advance newspaper about a corporate sex offenders Web site that contained biographical information about Benedict and his photograph.

He was booked into the Marin County Jail under a $500,000 bail enhancement because of the nature and quantity of the images seized and his access to children”
SOURCE

“A school bus driver and Boy Scout volunteer in Novato was arrested after a watchdog group linked him to pedophilia sites on the Internet and police seized a trove of child pornography from his home, authorities said Thursday.
Remsen McGinnis Benedict, 52, of Novato was booked into Marin County Jail on four counts related to possessing or exchanging child pornography. Bail was set at $500,000 because of Benedict’s “access to children and the nature and quantity of images seized,” said Novato police Sgt. Dave Jeffries.” SOURCE

Now isn’t that just a lovely sight? There’s no telling who’s gonna be next. There’s just no telling.

HUGE thanks to Perverted Justice and the Corporate Sex Offenders website for all the hard work. As I said yesterday….

“If we don’t stand up for children, then we don’t stand for much”
–Marian Wright Edelman

PING: Seamus & taf-kat

Since you’re so curious Seamus about your appearance on AZ, I’ll fill you in. You see, your pedo pal Greenfly came to be on AZ while out searching for…..something and he landed right HERE on this post.

We were just having a little heart-to-heart, you know a CHAT and we asked the question who are these men?

You, Seamus, were one of the ones that we asked about. We talked about you downloading child pornography and your methods for hiding it.

Of course we didn’t talk about I*Love*Green*Olives wanting to know your secrets but we can save the olive fweak for another day, eh?

Now LGsinmyheart says that he’s read you and he’s read AZ and he’ll

“blindly vouch for both Seamus and Taf-kat in this case . Sorry but Taf-kat and Seamus are just WAY more dignified and trustworthy than Absolute Intolerance can ever dream of being… “

Oh well, I guess the little freak just doesn’t appreciate us. But Dissident sure tucked tail. Yeah that radical pervert is now telling the GirlChatters to watch their mouths and stop talking sleazy and disrespectfully toward little girls. Funny in a way isn’t it? And of course LGsinmyheart tells Seamus not to even read us:

1) Absolute Intolerance is well known to be a heavily bugged site. I’d rather drink Mumbai’s sewage water than visit them.

2) Absolute Intolerance is also well known for its heavy (and quite immediate) censorship. I’d rather shout “Long live Israel” in the middle of Rafah than speak to them.

3) As a quite logical consequence of these two previous factors, Absolute Intolerance is also known to engage in harassment for sport. I’d rather date Britney than be harassed by them.

Believe me, nothing you have said and no way they might have twisted it is worth your time, security or liver.

Oh well, perhaps he’s right. Perhaps you should stay away from us when we talk about you….and when we don’t. In fact perhaps you shouldn’t even utter our name ‘cos see, there are rumors you know………about what happens to those who do.

Why just ask taf-kat, we talked about him too….more than once. About his conviction for child pornography….how much it cost him in terms of loss in his life.

I suppose what I’m wondering is why I’m not to be believed when I directly quote taf-kat? Why would LGsinmyheart prefer to believe the confession coming straight from taffy’s mouth? Why would I be taking taffy’s words out of context when I quoted him saying:

“Next to them, piled high, were the many CD’s filled to bursting with my precious pictures, tens of thousands of them, all kinds, from innocent, fully clothed girls, through posed nudity, to the hardest cp you can imagine. Like the books, I was so familiar with every single image, they had been sorted and re-sorted, into age order, into filename order, all the series sorted, my favourite folder, my pigtails folder, my blow-job folder…if there was a different way to sort them, I had done it.”

Or why I would be wrong if I said taf-kat hadn’t learned his lesson? When back in June he was starting again. What purpose does a grown man without a little girl to raise have for a children’s fashion catalog?

See, his addiction, like all addictions is progressive. Today he may be on eBay bidding on a child’s fashion book, tomorrow he’ll be out trying to score some hard core child pornography. Next thing you know he’ll be walking away in handcuffs and hopefully before he starts in on little Suzie next door.

Of course if you guys don’t like us exposing the truth about you, you can always tell it to the media.

kissbyalice:

I’m sick and tired of all the great injustice. Why dont we start a demonstration? Why dont we start giving more TV interviews? Why not protest? Why not give PJ twofold what they’ve given us? I want change and I want it now!

Yeah, well that’s always an option. But if I were you I’d ask Kevin Brown what happened when he tried that. lol, yeah why don’t you ask him?

Happy Birthday From AZ, Nigel!

And just to make this day even more memorable, we’ve prepared a Nigel Oldfield:

This-is-your-life-you-filthy-pedophile video:

Happy Birthday Nigel!

Jimbo Bites the Dust

And who’s this happy character?

Why it’s none other than Boychat’s own Jimf3 or James Patrick Finn III.

You can read more about him here:

A mix of old-fashioned and newfangled vigilante justice helped police nab a Lincoln Park man they say they caught in the act of downloading computerized child pornography.
Before deputies armed with a search warrant walked in on James Patrick Finn III, 42, at his home computer this week, he was outed by someone circulating fliers claiming Finn is a “pedophile activist,” said Wayne County Sheriff Warren Evans.

“They wanted to warn people that this was a guy who outwardly was an advocate of pedophilia,” Evans said. “This was not
something that he was hiding.”

A special HT to the folks at PeeJ’s Corporate Sex Offender Registry for pulling this one off.

James Finn III was arrested due to the fliers sent out by CSO volunteers to his community. Finn, 42, then was found to have over 600 images of child pornography as well as thirty videos of child pornography. He faces a maximum of twenty years in jail. Finn was the first “featured article of the month” here on the Wikisposure project and volunteers in our forum activism area decided to selectively pepper his community with fliers

Another Boychat member, arrested for Child Pornography – What a surprise.

Initial reactions to the news at Boychat have been psychotic, this from Bill Evans:

I can’t imagine Jim being stupid enough to actually have material on his computer that is illegal. Time will tell, on that one. I do find the fact that there are only 3 charges from 568 stills and 30 movies to be a telling point, though.

Just remember, he who laughs last, laughs longest.

Yes indeed Bill, and when is that court date of yours again?

Let’s Help Norbert Get to Prison

The new Anti game I suppose you could call it.

It’s not very challenging though I must say….because all we have to do is sit back and watch him destroy himself.

Norbert is trying to make a political statement apparently and considering that he and Lindsay are in cahoots it comes as no surprise.

Two radical pedoheads together is gonna be some nasty business. They are puffing each other up and we all know that nothing good can possibly come of that.

Norbert made a video game you see, the Pedo Quest but before he did he asked all the little nodding pedoheads at GirlChat for ideas on stereotypical pedophilia related objects. He got some interesting answers, but his own were the most noticeable. KY Jelly for example. Amazingly enough the guy went through with it.

Yes Norbert is trying very very hard to draw attention to himself. And I do believe it’s working. I have a sneaky suspicion though that the consequences aren’t going to be what Norbert anticipated.

Take a look at Norbert’s game. And let’s see what we know about Norbert, eh?

We know he’s young

We know he got kicked out of University.

We know he has radical politics…..PNVD….. Party for Neighbourly Love, Freedom, and Diversity.

Some of his goals include:

• Lower Age of Consent to 12 and eventually abolish AOC altogether
• Legalize private use of child pornography
• Allow non-violent pornography to be screened on daytime television
• Eliminate marriage in the law
• Permit public nudity anywhere in the country

We know what he fantasizes about:

Raping little girls

And now we know what he’s been watching:

“You realize how absurd it is to even have to explain the benefits of greater sexual freedom for children, when you see a child – when you see child pornography of consensual sexual contacts. You know sex can be a source of joy for children when you see a boy enjoying being sucked off or the expression on the face of a girl who is cumming while being licked out. This, of course, is one of the reasons why anti-pedophiles want all child pornography to be illegal”

Interesting here to note that not only is child pornography illegal in the Netherlands but it is also illegal to incite child sexual abuse. Also of interest is the fact that what a person fantasizes about is a greater predicter of what they will do than what they say they will do. Dr. Abel

And according to Relapse prevention with Sex Offenders

“the longer sexual fantasies are maintained and elaborated on, the greater the chance that the behavior will be acted out in real life”

“the more individuals engage in fantasy, the more motivating and more detailed the rehearsal may become, and the more able the individuals are to convince themselves to act out the behaviour in real life”

Dr. Seto said:

people are likely to choose the kind of pornography that corresponds to their sexual interests

Ken Lanning said:

P 52 Pedophiles almost always collect child pornography and/or erotica

30% to 80% of individuals who viewed child pornography and 76% of individuals who were arrested for Internet child pornography had molested a child

NCMEC said:

Forty percent (40%) of those estimated arrestees were “dual offenders,” who sexually victimized children and possessed child pornography, with both crimes discovered in the same investigation.

Crimes Against Children Research Center said

Approximately 1 in 5 arrested CP possessors (21%) had images depicting sexual violence to children such as bondage, rape, and torture

Most of all let us not forget this

Ken Lanning:

Most preferential child molesters spend their entire lives attempting to convince themselves and others that they are not perverts.

Dr. Gene Abel:

Pedophilia is the most significant cause of child molestation.

But we all already know these things don’t we? And we know what they’re out there doing on the internet, don’t we? We know what they look for, don’t we? I wonder if Norbert is one of them……One of the men out looking for:

• molesting pics
• childrens fuck sex child rape underage

naked preteen boys blogspot

a website with pictures of naked kids

little minor girls fucked by daddy’s

preteen girls fucking older men for their first experiance

illegal child rape pics

how to molest little girls

This one is rather interesting, as he’s been here at least 8 times with similar search terms. Yeah, I’d say this guy won’t be giving up until he’s forced to. He just hasn’t yet learned that we don’t have what he’s looking for. That’s persistence. That’s a pedophile. That’s a child predator. That’s what Norbert would have people believe is normal.

HT to Jacey for graphics!

If it walks like a duck……

Hey, remember that crazy Aussie Pedohead we saw on video a few months ago? You know, the one that reminded us so much of Nigel? Well, he just lost an appeal BOO HOO.

His name is Geoffrey Leonard and he’s 73. In 1990 he was convicted of sexual assault against two brothers, then 12 and 16 years old for which he served 3 years in prison.

In 2006 he was before the court again charged with possession of 400 child pornography images. He pled guilty.

Then he appealed. Now his appeal application has been dismissed due to the fact that Geoffrey, being the brilliant pedohead that he is….posted an edited version of the statements made by those two boys he molested so many years ago on his website.

Geoff lost his appeal because of it…….and now BoyChat is so very nice to share that site that cost him his appeal…..with others by linking to a mirror site of it. (The actual site is long gone) I recommend you not bother. It’s huge and it’s nothing more than pedobabble and just as incoherent as Nigel Oldfield, Jd420 and danyfreak. It’s actually painful to read so I’ll save you the trouble and show you a bit of it here. This is just a small list of Geoffrey-isms:

• The poor kid who reaches 16 and who is innocent faces a life where he will never truly lose that innocence. He will never be truly sexually aware. he will never possess real sexual skill and his sexual relationships will always be difficult. The age of 16 is far too late to start learning about sex.
• If we give kids bread and honey in kindergarten, they will love the stuff from then on……What I am advocating is that, starting in kindergarten, kids should be taught how to masturbate.
• The thing is to catch the kids before their ideas become fixed
• I would go so far as to say that I strongly suspect that most people in our society are child sexual offenders, and that all but the unfortunate few have been sexually abused.
• People in authority do not like sex.
• We are a minority group that behaves sexually in the way that we do because we have no other choice.
• I firmly believe that kids should be taught to have sex from caring and skilled older partners.
• Christianity has attempted to abolish sex
• The ability to have good sex does not come out of the clear blue sky. It has to be learned.
• Sex is complicated.

Geoffrey obviously has issues. Look at a portion of a letter he wrote to one of the boys:

What we did is considered to be the ultimate act of intimacy. God has joined us in an act which at the time seemed a little clumsy & painful but in retrospect was like entering the gates of heaven

And as if that’s not enough he posted the boys statements to police about what Geoff did to them. He edited it first of course then left this comment

In addition there were a few charges relating to his 12 year old brother, one instance of oral sex and a couple of instances of masturbation. Hardly monstrous acts. And the whole thing is hardly the crime of the century.

Three years in prison and Geoffrey still has no insight into his own behavior does he? He still has no recognition of the boundaries that exist between people or the realization that….well that he has issues. But it reminded me so much of

28’s statement:

Erotic encounters, involving no penetration, should be at worst minor annoyances.

and Demosthenes who thought it acceptable to give drugs to a child to prevent them from going through puberty…..for his own sexual gratification.

Or Abraxas who was oblivious to the psychological discomfort a child experienced when forced to urinate in front of her classmates.

Or Vespucci who cops a feel of a sleeping 12 year old boy

Or Lindsay Ashford who believes 6 month old babies can consent to sex and is attracted to little girls because they are ripe

Or Olive Fweak who thinks message boards keep him from raping children.

Or Jack McClellan who took pictures of little girls and posted them on a pedophile website telling fellow perverts where to find them

Or Zlurker who said

I do not think we need to feel bad about giving in to the charms of beautiful girls. If we do not, then someone else will anyway

Or Nigel Leigh Oldfield who said

You must know, by now, that I will break laws that I view as unjust and I am willing to accept the consequences. And, no, the families, of which you speak would not have a cat-in-hells chance of legal action, even if I had pumped pints onto to their little cherubs (feel free to contact some and let them have my email)

We all view Geoffrey Leonard as a total lunatic I’m sure. Watching him in the video it’s hard to believe he hadn’t already been committed somewhere isn’t it? But are his beliefs any different than all of these other pedo activists that we’ve had the misfortune of crossing paths with? I’ll let you decide and why don’t you compare your findings with those of Febri-Chan

with a little editting and dash of commentary to guide the viewers’ perception, they take everything out of context and twist every single thing he said to make it sound like the guy is as “batshit” as every should think…….Anyway, the guy didn’t seem crazy or evil to me because I know in my gut that he was probably goaded into acting that way by some vulture of a reporter who was patiently and antagonistically waiting for the guy to snap.

Indeed.

But, is he armed?

Well Dylan Thomas says that’s a rhetorical question. But, no it’s much more than that isn’t it? That was a threat and it was an attempt to puff up his pedo brothers with the delusion that not only should they strike out at Antis but they should strike preemptively. He gives the scenario of a black man harassed for the color of his skin. In one scenario this man is armed yet in another he’s not. The question being, when he feels threatened should he strike out in case they DO try to hurt him. Notice the question is not IF he’s attacked but rather to make sure that he’s not. He tries to compare the prejudices and injustices committed against a race of people with the hatred and scorn people feel for him and his kind, those who prey on children. And he ends it in typical Dylan fashion…….

And now a final question, entirely rhetorical. Am I armed?

Interestingly enough, just yesterday the Pedophile known as ‘28′ normally seen on GirlChat showed up at BC to commiserate over the decimation of their beloved child sexual abuse holiday and the unveiling of the Sex Offender Wiki maintained by Perverted Justice. Ooooh they were all in a tizz over that one. So 28 who has a habit of saying stuff like:

I am trying to hone in on a strategy that stands a chance of advancing both the rights of children and eventually our own.

We must not stress or insist that we should have a right to be involved with them(children)……not yet anyway

Classic grooming behavior. They apparently think that because it works on children it will work on everyone. That was 4 years ago when he said those things, and now in 2007 he says:

They (Antis) never take the time to meet and greet real Child Lovers with an open mind, preferring instead to name and shame them without even knowing who they are. This ignorance based hatred is neither rational, nor socially responsible.

Antis hate the stereotypical pedophile; the Chester the Molester caricature.

Oh! He must mean someone like oh maybe Zlurker! Yeah, GLMeister who hangs out at playgrounds using his own children for bait.

28 goes on to liken the situation he finds pedophiles in to groups like women, blacks, Jews. It’s sad that someone could be so deluded, except when you remember that he is choosing this. He chooses to self-identify. He chooses to commune with pedoheads. He chooses to pedo-philosophize. Is it any wonder then that he can’t comprehend the difference in say a black man who couldn’t claim to be a white man and go about his business. Or a white woman who couldn’t claim to be a man, or a European Jew who couldn’t do anything. Men like this who use and abuse the suffering of others demean these people and make others shake their heads at their desperation.

No, 28, you can walk amongst us unidentified…..until you act out or open your mouth and demand something that we will not give you. Not ever. I find it interesting that we talk about this today when just recently Dylan Thomas made this point:

I don’t think one can name any element of Nazi extermination of the Jews that is not already present in our current situation.

Dylan compares the gold stars to electronic identifiers, our prisons to concentration camps etc etc blah blah blah. I can only wonder what he thinks when he sees images of what happened to Jews during the Holocaust. How DARE he or any of these other perverts compare themselves to what those people endured….. To have their entire lives stripped away, their children ripped from their arms and sent to death or killed in front of them, to be starved, raped, beaten, operated on without anesthesia, to be forced to walk around nude, stripped even of their hair and for no other reason than the fact that they were Jewish. How the hell do you live with yourself Dylan Thomas, 28, Curtis and every single one of you low life scumbags. To even make such a comparison proves beyond any doubt what monsters you are. You aren’t worthy to have a voice, you aren’t worthy to speak and you certainly aren’t worthy to be heard. You are all child predators. And every last one of you are dangerous individuals who threaten children not only in your daily lives but with the fact that you proliferate this pedo nonsense to impressionable young men.

And so Dylan…….with your head full of your own martyr complex for no other reason than your desire to rape boys, you should know….as if you didn’t…….that we heard you loud and clear. We heard you when you said:

If they want a war, we’ll give them one. They may have numerical superiority, but we’re invisible. We’ll be sitting in on their strategy sessions while they’re still trying to figure out who the hell we are.

And we heard you today when you said:

When I “draw attention” to the possibility of pedophiles using deadly force, I am not “crossing the line into the unacceptable.” I’m performing a public service…… Let’s make sure this is clear: pedophiles will use deadly force…….Sooner or later, someone will kill some cops, vigilantes or kids.

Yes lots of eyes are on you. But you are a stinking, filthy pedophile. And stinking, filthy pedophiles don’t realize how utterly devoid of rational thinking they really are. That’s why they keep saying such stupid things. Ken Lanning said:

Need-driven behavior leads to bewildering mistakes.

But then he also said:

Men sexually attracted to young adolescent boys are the most persistent and prolific child molesters known to the criminal justice system.

Kevin Brown has the best idea. Which is rather surprising after the Rick Roberts fiasco and the fact that the poor boy doesn’t know the difference between the cavalry and Calvary. Take a look at his sigpic. Nevertheless today he says:

I support creation of an autonomous settlement in Africa — Rwanda, Congo, or Mozambique — taking up arms to defend ourselves, and building an economy that can pay for peace with the regional military power. Whether that is a rational alternative to the violence and discrimination we face in the west is difficult to answer. What value does one place on their freedom?

I don’t know Kev. It’ll be interesting to see how you like living in a third world country though. Yes, indeed. You know…….one of those advanced and enlightened places that the west should emulate? Yeah, one of those. I fully support deporting your sorry ass though. I’ll help raise the money if you’ll go. Yes! finally an idea to unite the Anti’s and the Pedoheads! You pick a place Kevin! Isolate yourselves somewhere far far away from civilization, and we….those who choose to be civilized we will pay your way. Every last one of you. I DARE you.

Violet has a good idea, I suggest you check out her blog. Her new invention would win her a Nobel Peace Prize. And it all has to do with the pedo stench. Because you can smell them you know. Here’s an example. Men who find AZ while looking for other stuff. Stuff they aren’t meant to be looking for. Are they pedophiles? Oh yeah, of course they are. And like Camper of BC once said:

Our desire for porn makes us use bad judgement sometimes

Some of these guys are more determined than others, they return again and again. There’s thousands of these search terms and we get them everyday. Everyday I tell you! I’ll show you a few.

• gagged raped cuties
• illegal child rape pics
• old men fucking preteen girls
• 10yo naked children
• child porn naked boy
• free pictures illegal pedo 10yo porn
• preteen virgins fucked
• child kids fucking porn
• pedophilia girl rape pictures
• boys raped by men
• pretty little girl pedo rape
• fucking young girls who are only 8
• underage incest pre-teen paedo lolita sex
• very hard pedo porn kids fuck pics
• men kissing and raping little girls for sexual gratification

And the awards go to:

• stupidest of the day: Am I safe after totally deleting traces of child porn
• most frustrated: minor preteen child pedo just give me the fucking porn
• most horrific: 5yo enjoys gentle pedo fuck from very big dick, child sex

I smell them. The filthy, stinking pedophiles. Filthy, filthy pedophiles. They’re breathing our air. They’re stinking up our world. They’re preying on our children.

"I’m watching you, little girl"

I’m referring to Joshua Kistler the 31 year old pervert recently sentenced to 24 years in prison for his online predatory behavior. What did he do?

First he posed as a 15 year old boy using images of his own son. He sent those pictures and videos to young girls and claimed to be dying of Leukemia….all to entice them into sending him sexually explicit pictures of themselves. The girls ranged in age from 12-14.

On March 11, 2005, FBI agents in Portland served a search warrant on defendant’s residence, recovering numerous CD’s and two computers that the defendant admitted to containing files of movies of young women in various states of undress, some of which were taken and recorded without their knowledge. In addition, a forensic examination revealed thousands of images containing depictions of child pornography.But hey, it gets worse.

He had a program which had recorded the girls on their web cams without their knowledge and he saved the videos.

He stated that he’d “always been a collector”

As part of his plea deal he gave agents detailed information about the software he used to view and record webcam video without alerting the person with whom he was sharing a connection, software designed to simulate reciprocal webcam video for the purpose of deceiving those minors with whom he was chatting.

This was eerily similar in a way to the case of the stolen panties except that the creep factor on this guy is off the scale. I suppose it should come as no surprise. We have no doubt that guys like this have no respect for others, including the little girls they claim to just love. Interesting that this guy made the comment

“I’m sorry for the harm I’ve caused,” he said. “I wasn’t aware I was causing any harm.”

I found that interesting. And especially when you take into consideration pervert attacks on any law against their behavior. They don’t like the idea that their privacy might be invaded. But the privacy of these young girls meant nothing. Just like their psychological well-being meant nothing. In fact none of the girls meant anything at all to this man except as a means to achieve sexual gratification. So what makes him different than these other guys? He got caught. That’s the only difference.

Now what do the pedofreaks think about this?

Apple

believes its an over reaction on the girls part…. obviously he shouldn’t have been so sneaky but 24 years in prison seems an excessive sentence

Mediapunk

You can only be charged with possession of child pornography. It is not illegal to look at it or view it on a web cam. To my knowledge, there are no laws barring sexual type talk with minors

Infinity:

The first amendment simply does not apply anymore, free speech does not legally exist in the United States anymore

Patrick Kiernan of the FBI Internet Crimes Taskforce says:

“You wouldn’t invite a stranger into your house, or into your bedroom. Don’t let your computer do the same thing.”

Some recommended steps to help protect your child from this sort of thing include:

• do not let your children have computers in their rooms; put them in open rooms only

• keep your computer turned off when you aren’t using it, and if you have a webcam, turn it to the wall when you are not using it, or at least obstruct the view

• purchase your children an email account instead of having them use a free one.

These men have one thing on their minds……..and it’s not the well-being of your child. I believe we’ll be seeing more cases like this. We should all warn everyone of this danger. This man, like so many of these online pedofreaks we see, simply has no soul.

A Profile of Pedophilia Part 2

To continue on with our discussion of the article published by the Mayo Clinic Dr. Seto classifies pedophiles according to whether or not child pornography and/or a computer was used to engage the child in sexual activity.

1. Stalkers – who try to gain physical access to children
2. Cruisers – who use the internet for direct sexual pleasure without physical contact (chat rooms)
3. Masturbators – who use the internet for passive gratification (child pornography)
4. Networkers or Swappers – who communicate with other pedophiles and trade information, pornography, and children
5. Combination of the previous 4 types

According to Ken Lanning

30% to 80% of individuals who viewed child pornography and 76% of individuals who were arrested for Internet child pornography had molested a child

According to NCMEC

Forty percent (40%) of those estimated arrestees were “dual offenders,” who sexually victimized children and possessed child pornography, with both crimes discovered in the same investigation. An additional 15% were dual offenders who attempted to sexually victimize children by soliciting undercover investigators who posed online as minors.

According to the Crimes Against Children Research Center

We found 40% of the cases involving CP possession in the N-JOV Study involved dual offenses of CP possession and child sexual victimization detected in the course of the same investigation. All of these offenders had identified child victims. An additional 15% both possessed CP and attempted to sexually victimize children by soliciting undercover investigators posing online as minors. When these cases of attempted child sexual victimization are counted, 55% of the CP possessors were dual offenders

Here are some other quick stats:

• 39% of arrested offenders who met victims online possessed child pornography
• 43% of offenders who solicited undercover investigators posing onine as minors possessed child pornography
• 27% of dual offenders had shown or given child pornography to identified victims
• Approximately 1 in 5 arrested CP possessors (21%) had images depicting sexual violence to children such as bondage, rape, and torture.
• Most had images of prepubescent children (83%) and images graphically depicting sexual penetration (80%)
• One in six investigations beginning with allegations or investigations of CP possession discovered dual offenders.
• 39% of arrested offenders who met victims online and 43% of offenders who solicited undercover investigators were dual offenders
• Almost all arrested CP possessors (96%) were convicted or plead guilty, and 59% were incarcerated.

And should you wonder what motivates these possessors of child pornography, Taylor & Quayle has this to say:

• Sexually interested in prepubescent children (pedophiles) or young adolescents (hebephiles), who use child-pornography images for sexual fantasy and gratification
• Sexually “indiscriminant,” meaning they are constantly looking for new and different sexual stimuli
• Sexually curious, downloading a few images to satisfy that curiosity
• Interested in profiting financially by selling images or setting up web sites requiring payment for access

Dr Seto said:

people are likely to choose the kind of pornography that corresponds to their sexual interests, so relatively few nonpedophilic men would choose illegal child pornography given the abundance of legal pornography that depicts adults.

What were the images?

• 83% had images of children between the ages of 6 and 12
• 39% had images of 3 to 5 year old children
• 19% had images of toddlers or infants younger than 3
• 92% had images of minors focusing on genitals or showing explicit sexual activity
• 80% had pictures showing the sexual penetration of a child, including oral sex
• 21% had child pornography depicting violence such as bondage, rape, or torture. Most of these involved images of children who were gagged, bound, blindfolded, or otherwise enduring sadistic sex

What happened to these men? Does anyone think it’s easy to get out of something like this? Well I believe that they get a slap on the wrist compared to what they should get, but they don’t get off that easy. It does indeed effect their lives and in some cases you might say it destroys them. Their reputation, their marriages, their jobs even. Basically they lose the respect of anyone who has known them. Who could respect someone who does such a thing? How many get away with it completely? Look at the following chart

Returning to Ken Lanning ’s Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis whom the pedophiles misquote on almost a daily basis and whose work is quoted extensively in the Mayo article I’d like to share some random quotes of his that ties in nicely with this discussion

P 30 Need-driven behavior leads to bewildering mistakes

P 43 Pedophiles are skilled at manipulating children

P 52 Pedophiles almost always collect child pornography and/or erotica

P 69 Collecting this material may help them satisfy, deal with, or reinforce their compulsive persistent sexual fantasies…..Collecting may also fulfill needs for validation. …It is almost as though each hour spent on the internet and each communication and image is evidence of the value and legitimacy of their behavior.

P 70 Although their brains may tell them not to send child pornography or reveal details of past or planned criminal acts to someone they met online, their need for validation often compels them to do so. They believe what they need to believe

P 81 Pedophiles are more likely to use trickery, bribery or seduction to take their photographs of children. …..Many pedophiles even collect photographs of children who are complete strangers to them….

From David Alway aka Lindsay Ashford who spreads propaganda that child pornography doesn’t exist to his pedo brothers: Nigel (convicted of greater than 11,000 CP images), Taf-Kat (convicted of greater than 70,000 images), to Infinity moderator of GirlChat (a picture of a six yr old giving a blow-job and a subscription to a little girl nudie site) and justified it like this:

What was I thinking? Apparently I wasn’t thinking, that is what an addict does, they do not think about what they are doing or any consequences, they just need the “fix”. I liked looking at those pics and I made a mistake

I SURVIVED the NIGHTMARE that is prison, and I got out, got a kick-ass job, have tons of lg’s in my life

All these guys lead right back to Lindsay and men like Dylan Thomas of BoyChat who promote child porn and child prostitution.

I got off the Mayo article a bit here with this discussion of child pornography which was only a small part of the article as it covers the entire pedophile topic. CP is a big issue. It’s HUGE. Regardless of what Lindsay Ashford or even the lowly Jackson would tell you…..We’ve talked about this before. About the Lindsay’s of the world who love children so much that they want to legalize the exploitation of children for the sexual gratification of dirty old men. We asked Who are these men? and Is this a game? We talked about John Melanson aka Camper who said:

Our desire for porn makes us use bad judgement sometimes

And now we’ll talk about Stitches who says “I know what they’re looking for” I certainly don’t need a nodding pedo head – ILGO style to tell me it isn’t so. We’ll get back to Part 3 with the Mayo article soon but for now here’s some random search terms from the last few hours:

• diaper child models
• panties children kids fucking
• kindergarten pedo rape
• share pics boylover
• preteens pedo porn
• pics vids mommy’s boyfriend jacking off on little daughter
• pedo sex with 5yo girls
• pedo girls nude -teen -video
• web.archive boylove gallery
• watch illegal underground child porn of preteen girls
• young girls fucking
• mexican pedo pics
• exploit porn child free pictures girls
• kids pedo pics
• child models panties
• child porn video pedo rape
• 10yo boys naked and hard after sex

And my favorite:

• can someone go to jail for viewing child porn in their past?
• safe payment hard cp pedo
• how to pass the abel assessment

I’ll leave you with this thought: When the pedophile community attempt to ridicule what you are doing, when they scoff and when they rant, sometimes when they try to charm you…… remember who and what they are. Remember their motives for saying these things, and remember above all the results from the N-JOV Study

more than half of child pornography possession cases began with reports from individuals to law enforcement

A Parent’s Worst Nightmare

“You are a parent’s worst nightmare. You are one nightmare that I’m going to put to rest today.”

Judge Chet Tharpe said as he sentenced Steven Schurgard to 85 years in prison.

Steven’s father had reportedly turned his son in for his illegal acts back in 2002 after Steven threatened to kill his father. Apparently he had an anger management problem. But he had more problems than that, much more.

When Temple Terrace police went to serve Schurgard, the man who test drove cars for work and lived with his mother answered the door with a gun tucked in the waist of his pants. He threatened police and told them he had child pornography on his computer. Police returned with a search warrant and seized Schurgard’s computer and a cache of video and cassette tapes.

Though 617 child porn images were found on Steven’s computer, including video tapes of a teenage boy engaged in sex acts in the home Steven shared with his mother….rather than face a trial he plead guilty to three counts of promoting a sexual performance by a child, one count of lewd and lascivious conduct with a victim younger than 18 and five counts of possession of child pornography.

All that was left was to be sentenced by the judge. He could have received as little as 4 years.

Steven Schurgard, who once called himself “a full-fledged pedophile” on his Web site, told a judge Thursday that he was sorry for owning child pornography and filming a young man engaged in a sex act.

But when some of his videos Steven had made were played for the judge….Steven hummed along.

“No one else will ever do. I’m still in love with you.”

Is it any wonder then that the judge threw the book at him? We should have more of this type of judicial responsibility, and not just at the arrogant, in-your-face attitude of those like Steven Schurgard.

Schurgard’s open plea left the length of his sentence up to the judge. Tharpe watched a video of a 13-year-old boy whom Schurgard plied with video games, drugs and alcohol, then filmed performing sexual acts. He saw a sampling of the obscene images from the man’s computer. He was also shown evidence that would not have been allowed at trial but could be used by the judge to determine character. One video, set to the music from Jaws, showed Schurgard peeking through his blinds at a boy playing outside. Another captured him giggling guiltily as he flipped through pictures of naked boys and showed off literature from the North American Man/Boy Love Association, of which he was a member.

The DA “He is the very epitome of what parents lay in bed at night worrying about.”

The defense attorney: argued that the 13-year-old had been a willing participant

The judge: “The only regret I have is that I can only sentence you to 85 years”

Trucker: “I think he was just doing what all of us would do if these damn laws didn’t force us to obey them. I know the law shouldn’t be broken, but to give an honest, wonderful person like that life in prison, and knowing that he would never intentionally harm a child is just preposterous.”

Albert Ross: “maybe steve just doesn’t know the meaning of fear, but he still gets hero status in my book.”

Let’s look at what one of those videos were, shall we? Is this meant to instill fear in the hearts of parents? Is it meant to mock society? What the hell was he thinking when Steven Schurgard made this video and posted it on his website?? Norbert said it was meant to be humor. I, for one, am not laughing.