Fluff n’ Stuff

Amanda Rogers, as she likes to call herself, describes herself as

a freelance investigative journalist from Phoenix,AZ.

She is a human rights, civil rights, and child safety advocate, as well as a political ball buster. Amanda is the author of numerous articles and video blogs. Her articles and editorials have been published in news magazines both nationally and across the globe

Amanda writes for American Chronicle, an online tabloid type website. She’s also on the board of SoClear a pro sex offender rights organization which describes her this way:

Fed up with the barrage of blatantly unconstitutional and ineffective legislation regarding sex offenders and so-called “child protection”, Ms. Rogers has made it her mission to educate the public on the truth behind the headlines: To cut through the hype and spin to bring you the facts, un-tethered by political bias, affiliations, or agendas. It is only through truths, however painful, infuriating or embarrassing that real discussion on these issues can begin and effective changes be made.

Amanda believes that society is demonizing sex offenders. She believes we are mistreating them. She believes we are thus endangering children. She is an activist. Her issue is to reform sex offender laws. She supports the petition we wrote about HERE.

Amanda claims that that only 3% of sex offenders recidivate. She bases that on the 1994 DOJ report regarding recidivism rates of sex offenders. Then, in typical Lindsay Ashford style, she subtracts the number of those offenders in that study who were reconvicted within a 3 year period from 100% and erroneously concludes that it must mean 97% of sex offense cases are committed by someone never before convicted of a sex crime. WA LA She’s using this insane conclusion to promote abolishment of sex offender registries, life imprisonment sentences and age of consent laws.

When we very helpfully pointed out to her that studies done over a much longer period of time found that the offender didn’t typically start to re-offend until 5 years post release from prison, which would actually make this DOJ statistic a moot point, she very typically deleted our comments and proceeded to harass a CSA survivor. Wouldn’t want people to know the truth now would she?

Amanda wants this

Abolish all provisions of state and Federal sex offender registries.. There should be no internet or other public posting of the identity, photograph, address, workplace or personal information of any offender

Whose side is she on again? She believes you don’t have a right to know that Joe next door raped a 5 year old child………when you have a 5 year old child.

She also makes note, as do all these activists that there are very few sex crimes committed by those on the sex offender registry and in some insane twist of logic concludes that WA LA we don’t need one. Whereas I’m saying it may just be working. In cases where the offender was registered but they weren’t adequately followed by law enforcement, she concludes that we are wasting money on the SOR, whereas I believe we need to invest more money into it and ensure that all agencies have the staff and resources they need.

At one point she becomes so bold as to say that the reason for widespread under-reporting of child sexual abuse is because people know that bad stuff is gonna happen when they report it. For example prison sentences, SOR, possibly the breadwinner being removed from the home. Whereas if there were no punishment for sex offenders and it wasn’t something required by law to be reported, well then the victim could just gently guide the offender on down to the corner therapist and WA LA problem would be solved. She doesn’t understand sex offenders much does she?

I should say not. But I would like to ask her why she blames Adam Walsh’s mother for the actions of the man who cut off Adam’s head. And why she blames the family of Christopher Barrios and the entire system for the actions of the gruesome twosome who raped and murdered him while that hag looked on getting her jollies.

“Little Christopher paid the price for this ill thought out legislation with his very life. It is the opinion of this writer that lawmakers have just as much blood on their hands as the Edenfields themselves”

She refers to Mark Klass, Mark Lundsford, John Walsh as the flock of vultures. And addressing the issue of Megan Kanka (Megans Law) and the man who raped and murdered her (a convicted sex offender) she says that law enforcement knew he was dangerous and yet they let him out anyway. Well oh me oh my, if you really feel that way Amanda, why do you support doing away with all life imprisonment sentences for sex offenders? Why?

Why are you addressing the parents of murdered children with scorn and hostility in your voice? Why are you trying to dig up dirt on them? You wouldn’t be the judgmental type now would you? You wouldn’t be one to try and legislate morality now would you? You wouldn’t make a statement like: “The common thread with all of these cases is that the parents were living less than, shall we say, good moral lifestyles…..” And why are you blaming everyone, everyone for the deaths of Dylan Groene, Jessica Lunsford, Megan Kanka, Adam Walsh, Carly Brucia, and Danielle Van Dam except the men who actually committed the acts? Yes, Amanda, as parents we have to take care of our children, but when you said:

“This world is not your babysitter”

All I could think was……..Am I my brother’s keeper? And in this case, Amanda, yes yes yes I am. When it comes to children we all are. If you don’t agree then I would imagine you perhaps have ulterior motives for this cause of yours?

Amanda believes that teenagers are the victims in this modern day hysterical witch hunt. To solve that problem she supports this:

De-criminalize all consensual sexual activities among teenagers

She draws no line. A 19 year old 11 month and 29 day old person would be exempt from being prosecuted for having sex with a 13 year old and 1 day old child. Oh! But she did use the word consensual. As if she believes the 13 year old is capable of making a rational decision about sexual activity with the 19/20 year old. I guess she does believe it.

But on the other hand she DID say she was against pedophiles and so I’m just scratching my head here. WTF? Because you see what this petition says is

Stop public vilification and demonization of sex offenders. Oppose the use in the media or by public officials of obviously pejorative language with regard to offenders. Use of the term “pedophile” should be extremely limited and accurate. Children should be defined as persons under the age of puberty.

Ok, there is the definition of child that she supports. But then how do you explain this?

Support broad sex education for children, and empower them to make their own decisions and stand up for their rights

THAT right there is an advocation for abolishment of age of consent laws, and the typical pedophile movement’s modus operandi. Turn it on the child. Make THEM responsible for what the adults want to do to them.

And like we said before, this reform petition is about removing all punishments for sex offenders, placing the responsibility for CSA on the child, and removing restrictions for pedophiles. I think Amanda’s a malicious LIAR whose attempts to manipulate public opinion with false propaganda are on the lines of reckless endangerment.

And they call us ignorant and uneducated? Well, Amanda did. But then I think she has more hair than brains. In fact I just call her fluff n’ stuff.

Jan Elizabeth Kruska describes herself as

a freelance journalist from Phoenix, Arizona U.S.A.

She is the author of numerous articles, live concert reviews, and musician interviews which have been published both nationally and internationally. Jan also does live concert photography which helps to bring the stories and reviews together for both readers and fans.

Please see her website for more information and concert photos at http://www.rhythmnation.biz

Jan Kruska is a registered sex offender herself you see. Jan is Amanda. Jan has ulterior motives behind her numerous pro sex abuse articles, and her website and her organization of the rally in Miami and her support of this horrendous excuse for a petition that claims it is “part of the effort to support the happiness, well-being and freedom of children”

I did find it quite interesting that this petition which states:

We call on those who agree with us to sign our Call publicly, with full disclosure of real identity

And Jan did that. Yes indeed she did. The strange thing is that she also signed Amanda’s name. You know, the Amanda who doesn’t even exist?

I don’t know about you, but I would sort of think that a reformed sex offender wouldn’t stoop to lying now would they? And if they did…..which activities of theirs should we believe in and which ones should we question? As for me I don’t believe anything she has to say.

Graphics provided by Jacey

What’s the Hurry?

Look at Christopher Michael Barrios, of Brunswick Georgia. Look at his face. Look at that smile. Imagine him in front of you, six years old, how small he would be. 3 feet 6 inches tall and 60 pounds. Just a little boy playing on a swing set after he got off the school bus. Just a couple hundred feet away from home….

….And right across the street from a convicted sex offender.

His funeral was today.

Now let’s walk across the street and see what we find.

Why it’s George Edenfield who pleaded guilty in 1997 to molesting two boys, ages 7 and 9. He was sentenced to 10 years on probation.

As part of his 1997 conviction, George Edenfield had to register as a sex offender in Georgia. A Georgia law passed last year prohibits registered sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school bus stop; the Edenfields lived about 600 feet from the one Christopher waited at. This law has currently been put on hold, pending……

Now let’s see what else is across the street. Living with George we have his father.

David Edenfield. David pleaded guilty to incest in 1994.

Wonder if he also molested George when he was a boy? Enter the mother:

Peggy Edenfield. Not a registered sex offender, but she lied during the search for Christopher. She sent investigators off on wild goose chases….away from Christophers body.

But perhaps she wasn’t trying to cover up what her son did….or what her husband did for that matter. Maybe she was just trying to cover up for the fact that she watched while both her husband and her son molested the boy….Or the fact that she masturbated while watching?

Perhaps it was both. Nevertheless, all three have been arrested and charged with capital murder. Apparently the prosecutor will be seeking the death penalty….and frankly they all three deserve it, no matter which one actually strangled him to death….after getting their thrills. Or perhaps his death was part of the thrill. Of course, if Jessica’s Law had been in effect back in 1997….and George had received the minimum sentence of 25 years, little Christopher would still be alive.

Could anyone argue with that? Well Dissident could. You remember Dissident. The pseudo-pedo philosopher. There was a discussion about Jessica’s Law. And of course…as always..Dissident is opposed to any measure that might punish a pedo. He claims that it won’t prevent real child molestations it will merely punish those involved in consensual sex with children. Well he claims that child murderers should never be let out of prison in the first place so it doesn’t really effect them. But I think he’s missing the point. Is it purposeful?

John Couey was arrested for fondling a child. He served his time. He got out. He progressed….he kidnapped and murdered. George Edenfield was convicted of fondling two little boys. He got probation. No jail time. He progressed….he kidnapped and murdered. Are we seeing a pattern here? These are just two examples of why we need ONE STRIKE LAWS.

Just for the record here are some of the pedo-opinions about legislation like Jessica’s Law… one that would have prevented John Couey, George Edenfield and even Joseph Duncan from progressing:

Vespucci: “What a travesty of justice”

darth: “It is so sad that love has such a heavy punishment’

Santi: “Sex offenders, especially the ones to offend a minor are to pay forever.”

Dissident: “I find it highly insulting that the fears and emotional devastation of a family are used to divert further oppression upon a highly misunderstood minority group”

28: The only way to protect children is to educate them about the differences between child molesters and Pedosexuals….in order to empower children with the comprehensive knowledge they need, in order to make good decisions when confronted with potential exploitation.”

Lux: “For every one dangerous-to-children molester, there are a thousand harmless sex offenders”

Hierophant: “These are not anti molester laws….these are anti love laws.”

Turtle: “New laws won’t stop scumbags from raping children. They will just ruin more men and womens lives and continue to tear families apart.”

LGsinmyheart: “I would chop my feet off, bracelet included (speaking of tracking device), give the bracelet away as a present to a little girl….just to prove a point”

Well, you made your point LGsinmyheart. You sure did. Nothing will stop you will it? Not as long as you have your freedom anyway.

Jessica’s Law Challenged in Nebraska

James Fisher feels his rights are being infringed. He has been sentenced to lifetime supervision, GPS monitoring and unannounced searches of his home by parole officials. As a result he is currently suing the Nebraska Attorney General, Department of Corrections and the Parole Board. Full story here

His punishment comes as a result of Bill LB1199 – the Nebraskan equivalent of Jessica’s Law. Fisher’s attorney, Sue Ellen Wall, works as a “cooperating attorney” for the ACLU in Nebraska. You can read more about the ACLU’s connection to abuse and exploitation of children here and here. Not surprisingly, Wall had this to say:

It (sex crimes against children) is a problem we’re all cognizant of but you can’t just throw a human being into a cage without there being some rational basis for it.

Let’s see if we can find some rational basis, shall we?

He was convicted of brutally raping a 4 year old child

That is more than enough basis for me. I think I speak for all the contributors and allies of AZ when I say I don’t give a damn what Mr. Fisher feels he is entitled to.

A spokesman for the Attorney General has stated they are “prepared to defend” this legislation.

Please contact the Attorney General here to voice your support for this legislation and its application to this perpetrator. Let them know that the public supports their stance!

It is also vital to contact Nebraskan law-makers and ensure that laws continue to reflect the majority view that sexual predators against children have forfeited all their rights. Here are the relevant details to email:

Governor Dave Heineman
Senator Ben Nelson
Senator Chuck Hagel
Congressman Jeff Fortenberry
Congressman Lee Terry
Congressman Adrian Smith

A Modern Pedophile Attack on Children

Is it a virus as Nihil seems to think society is? Perhaps it’s cancer or the plague. Bill Glaser said it best in Paedophilia : the public health problem of the decade :

Imagine a society afflicted by a scourge which struck down a quarter of its daughters and up to one in eight of its sons. Imagine also that this plague, while not immediately fatal, lurked in the bodies and minds of these young children for decades, making them up to sixteen times more likely to experience its disastrous long-term effects: life-threatening starvation, suicide, persistent nightmares, drug and alcohol abuse and a whole host of intractable psychiatric disorders requiring life-long treatment.

Society understands this and is taking preemptive measures against those who don’t. Against those who would harm our children, those who threaten their safety with their lies and deceit.

ONE STRIKE YOU’RE OUT

will be the catch phrase that we use to put a stop to this crap that has gone on for far too long. Of course the entire pedohead community thinks we’re hysterical, but I wonder if they really want to take a chance that we aren’t serious? Perhaps we should first look at the words of one of the pedo-activists out there speaking on behalf of nodding pedo heads. Let’s go back to nihil_aeturnius:

In the modern age, children exist in a truly grim state of affairs. Their lives and choices are routinely subject to oppressive control, rather than loving guidance. Their interests are often narrowed from the time they can speak…….. into activities they have no interest in but serve the self-aggrandizement of selfish parents

Nihil believes there are 3 main components which facilitate the total development of children:

1-Good Parenting
2-Good Teaching
3-Good Outside Influences i.e. Pedophiles

Nihil believes that parents think of their children as burdens, and that those people who choose not to have children reflect badly on themselves…..and on those people who DO have children. NOT having children, says Nihil:

inevitably leads to a slow decline in the effort placed into parenting. Many parents are incapable of performing the balancing act of guidance and freedom that the job entails – therefore, you either have controlling parents who restrict their children’s every activity, or deadbeat parents who let their children sit on their ass and watch TV all day.

So, the answer to all problems regarding children then, according to nihil is for everyone to have children whether they want to or not, to raise them the way that nihil thinks they should be raised, and to have a dirty old man in their lives to enrich their childhood and free them from unwanted piano and ballet lessons.

Nihil thinks pedophiles are the only answer to problems our children may face:

it comes to us – the outside forces, the lovers of children. It is our responsibility to right the ship…….so that children can be brought up in the best environment possible.

The nodding pedohead Paper-doll calls this deranged rant a *motivating* argument!

Nihil forgets the fact that people who have children do so for reasons other than perverted pedophilic selfish sexual desires. ***IF*** Nihil’s intentions are not sexual in nature but a true love for children then perhaps he should have his OWN child. This will serve several purposes:

• 1-He’ll have a child to give *all he has to offer* to
• 2-He’ll learn what it REALLY means to be a parent
• 3-He’ll leave our children alone
• 4-He’ll finally shut his incessant rattling mouth

I’ll sum everything up for Nihil and all the other pedofreaks out there.

You don’t have a monopoly on loving children.

People who care for children, why they have a family. They raise their children, and NO it is not all fun and games. It’s work, hard work. You are responsible for them 24/7. So before you—Nihil— you little twit, DARE to call parents ’selfish’, I suggest you get a little bit of experience in life first. Experience for yourself first hand the long hours, the work, the sleepless nights, the worry, the sacrifice along with the intense joy and deep love that goes along with being a parent. After you have done these things and have some experience from which to speak you might feel differently. As it is you’re just one more stupid pedofreak. Nothing more. Nothing less.

And I will leave you with a final word from Bill Glaser:

The comparison of paedophilia to a plague is more than just a vivid metaphor. It suggests that lessons can be learned from the other great scourges and pestilences of human history.

Tolerance is not an option

Jessica’s Law, Proposition 83, Megan’s Law, Dylan’s Law, Adam Walsh Child Protection & Safety Act all of these enacted and/or proposed laws came about due to a heinous act and the death of a child.

We all feel revulsion when we learn of these acts of atrocity. It sickens us, we feel pain in our hearts for what the child went through and we empathize with the victims survivors.

But imagine for a moment that it were your child…….difficult isn’t it? And while we would never wish any of these things on anyone….we’re still glad that it’s not our own when we hear of it.

We look at them, our children, with wonder. They, whom we love like no other, are our treasures. We know that no one will ever hurt our children. No, not ours. Why?

Because it would be too much to bear. It would be beyond our comprehension to even imagine it. And yet, those things do happen, have happened and will continue to happen until we put a stop to it. Until we say:

NO MORE!
ABSOLUTE ZERO TOLERANCE!
ONE STRIKE AND YOU’RE OUT!
NO EXCUSES!

You who would harm a child, you who would even think of it, you who steal children’s underwear and photos from family albums, you who produce child pornography, distribute it, or possess it, you who fantasize about toddlers and babies, you who molest children and call it love, you who spread your filth around the internet and encourage your ‘brothers’….your time is up. You can either get back into that toybox you crawled out of or pay the consequences. Tolerance is not an option.