August 27, 2007
August 23, 2007
Who is this woman?
Who is Jan Kruska, AKA Amanda Rogers, AKA Jan Gustafson, AKA Jan Nelson? We wrote about her here We wrote about her activities regarding sex offender reform and her ideas about sex offenders.
Jan of course is angry about being exposed and says she’s worried about her own children being humiliated because of this. But once again that is just another step in the blame game.
SHE is the only one to blame for her activities. And why does she want to protect her own children while throwing everyone else’s literally to the wolves?
Her advocation of sweeping reform which would essentially abolish all punishment for child molesters AND even remove laws which make their activities illegal can be seen as nothing less than child endangerment.
Jan likes attention and she has definitely made the news now. Check it out and read for yourself about her other activities. Does anyone remember what happened the last two times a new wiki entry was released at Corporatesexoffenders.com? I do, we wrote about them here and here
What is Jan’s reaction to this you might wonder? Well, this person who calls herself a REFORMED sex offender….has lashed out at an innocent person in her haste to take down Stitches.
She’s made herself a webpage outing someone as me. She’s digging into her personal life. She’s doing this with malicious intent to bring harm to this person. Tell me Jan, how does it make you feel to be gloating over exposing someone’s LEGAL activities, especially when that person had never even heard your name before. When that person was not in any way involved in anti-pedophilia activism or Absolute Zero United for that matter.
I messaged Jan not once, but twice telling her she had the wrong person. The person she’s attacking has contacted her also. All to no avail. So you may ask yourself why? Why would Jan try to wreak havoc on an uninvolved party this way? I suppose we could give the easy answer that she’s obviously not very bright. This is thoroughly documented already in her prolific writings and frenzied hatred for child advocates.
We saw her sarcasm, her mocking hostility toward parents of brutally murdered children. What else is she capable of? But I think it goes even deeper than all that. Jan has her head set on it, you see. It doesn’t matter if the info is accurate or not. Jan believes it, and to Jan that’s all that matters. She’s cognitively distorted, and in her attempt to rip up someone’s life she’s hurting herself far more than any of us ever could.
Besides the uninvolved person she has attacked, Jan is going to have to live with the damage she has caused this person, this person who is not me. This person who was out busy living life unaware of people like Jan. JAN is solely responsible for her own actions.
I called Jan a Fluff n’ Stuff. Jan proved it was true.
June 14, 2007
It’s working!
Per our discussion going on now in the Anniversary post regarding Spike’s post about a pedohead who committed suicide, I think we can’t pass this one up. In summary Spike was called to offer counsel to the family of a man who killed himself. Though the man lived very close to Spike he wasn’t known to him, but hey! guess what? They were pedo brothers! The note read:
“I have lived with the guilt of having an attraction toward children for many years now, and I have kept this away from everyone, even myself at times, I have convinced myself many times that this is not true, only to come back and slap me in my face, whenever I see a little girl!” “To my children, though I loved you very much, I intentionally kept myself away from you so that I would not harm you in anyway.”
Now, he never said in this note whether or not he had acted on his attraction, did he? But he did say that he kept himself distant from his own children “so that I would not harm you in anyway.”
I think that statement is very important, and most especially considering they are his final words. And yet….he goes on to hurt them anyway doesn’t he? Just like all pedoheads sooner or later they just can’t keep their mouths shut. He’s killing himself because he can’t bear being a filthy pedophile and he’s gonna slap down everybody in his life as he goes. Never mind that his children and family will be suffering over his death, now they also have to deal with the shock and shame that their loved one was a filthy, stinking pedophile. He made his family victims in the end, didn’t he? And Spike says, what again?
I feel the hate of the community toward this man, and he has done NOTHING wrong, but simply he finds a child sexually attractive, and because of THIS he deserves to die by his own hands, or by somone else’s hands. Where are as a society that we feel this way toward another human being?
You don’t know that Spike, but like that fool Abraxas you’ll defend your pedo brothers no matter what, won’t you? Check out BB
You, my friend, are in a very good position here, because of your profession. Without casting suspicion on yourself, you can freely rebuke those who speak ill of this man, in the name of Christ.I encourage you to handle those horrible mean-sprited people with rightious and measured indignance. If anyone can get away with it, it’s a man of God.
OH! So now he’s going to exploit God! Pedophiles know no boundaries. All of this because the authorities are investigating him. Is that not the only responsible thing to do? He was after all tortured enough to kill himself. It’s pretty self-explanatory…..unless of course you’re a pedophile.
Now, for the interesting part……..what’s their take on it? The other members of that den of inequity called GirlChat.
#1 for pedo-stupidity goes to Tyciol:
It’s disgusting how they’d interview the family like that afterwards. Like admitting to being a pedophile automatically means you are one
…I feel great sorrow and empathy for the children who are–no doubt–going to suffer greatly at the evil hands of the self-righteous moral bigots. One More Reason……..why I constantly and consistently say WE NEED TO SPREAD THE MESSAGE. We need to open up, tell people who we are, and be brave.
I don’t know about that Abraxas. It seems to me part of your problem is that you guys have tried to cram this down our throats for far too long.
Uriel decides to test the waters:
I feel for his family and all the children that will be subjected to asinine interrogations while they try to find a way to smear his name.
Damn Uriel, he smeared his own name. Like I said over on Tampa Pirate, there is nothing worse you can call someone than a pedophile. And in this case, he did it himself.
It’s not fun at all to find your own community having such terrible feelings towards this man who was a victim of society, not the other way around.
The people whose reactions are hatred aren’t hardly worth a second thought. They aren’t worth the pain they’re causing.
The pain Kero? Ummm, who was it now that left that note? Who was it that killed himself again? Because, seriously now, this is a bit confusing.
Pyrgos:
This man was willing to die because he had been coerced into thinking that he was a danger to that which he loved more than anything else: Children.
I am desperately sad for this man being driven to take his life by his own love for his kids and his twisted view of his own condition brought on by this sick society we live in.This man loved his own family so much and at the same time was driven by the self-hatred thrust upon him from every quarter of society. He did the one thing he could think of to protect them from the monster society had convinced him that he really was
Oh, but now it starts to get really good. Check out Mesmerised:
This is deeply tragic. And it shows the importance of support networks – maybe if he had been a part of an online community like GC, he would not have taken that drastic course.
Dissident:
This is indeed a terrible tragedy, old friend. It’s a shame that man never found GC. If he had found us, we would have let him know that he wasn’t evil for being attracted to girls, and that he could very well be a good person regardless of who he was attracted to
Trucker:
Like Dissident said, if he had discovered this place first maybe he wouldn’t have committed suicide. I know how you feel Spike
there was a guy in my outpatient group a year ago who tried to kill himself because he couldn’t control his attraction to LGs, and all because he thought himself as being “sick.”
Now I’m realllly confused. If he’d had GC he wouldn’t have killed himself? Society is bad for thinking you’re all wasted use of good oxygen? I don’t know, it doesn’t sound right, because we just talked about this the other day. And all I can think is
Dude!!
It’s working already!!!
Where is my sympathy? Society’s sympathy? It’s with innocent children, that’s where. It’s with the man’s own family and the suffering they will go through.
Pedoheads, it’s not because people are hysterical about child rapists, no it’s because it’s the absolute worst thing you could find out about your loved one. So, no, I’m not sympathetic at all. In fact, the proudest day of my life will be when one of them kills himself and leaves a note saying
“I can’t take it anymore. Stitches drove me to it”
March 20, 2007
It’s a New Plan, Man
Danyboy, the frequent mad scientist logician visitor to AZ, for some unknown reason believes people want to debate him. hmmph. Anyway, he has a new plan. He doesn’t understand that Google who owns Blogger….you know the Blog service that’s been removing pedo blogs? Yeah, well he doesn’t understand that that Google is the same Google that owns Google Pages. So he’s going to start practicing pedo-terrorism on Google Pages instead. Not only that he says:
we will now be able to use images of youthful beauty in exactly the way that so many have been punished for; as a tool of activism.
What was that? A childlover said what?
we will now be able to use images of youthful beauty ………… as a tool of activism.
Yeah that’s what I thought it said. You can see his post HERE and you can report his pro pedophilia, pro adult/child sex propoganda HERE
And to add some humor to the situation, I thought you’d like to know about his insane insistence that I am multiple people. So, I’ve finally figured out why he thinks this. He made a time graph of all mine and Daydreamers activities on AZ, I suppose trying to find a conspiracy in the times of day we commented. So I suppose we must now add another player to this bizarre conspiracy. Look at this:
I am the green dots and Daydreamer is the red dots. So if you squinch your eyes, hold your mouth just right, stand exactly 3.17 feet away, and connect the dots juuuusssst right….you can see why he thought I was other people.
Ah HA! Another subliminal message I’ve been sending danyboy’s way….just to make him feel CRAZY!
March 7, 2007
We have some Intelligence
That Daniel is a stupid pedophile. Yes that’s right….Daniel Lievre who owns that website that teaches fellow pedophiles how to go forth and multiply their cognitive distortions and is the author of Pedo Logic for Dummies. The same Daniel who says he’s sexually attracted to children but he’s not a pedophile….because he’ll have sex with anybody. Daniel is a child predator, that’s what Daniel is.
I’ve had run-ins with danyboy on other blogs. I’ve witnessed first hand his attempts to terrorize. I’ve witnessed first hand his attempt to use psychology — in his slimey pedo grooming voice….on a child sexual abuse survivor. His attempt to denigrate their suffering, his attempt to rationalize the abuse itself, and his attempt to place the blame for it elsewhere. danyboy doesn’t know that his pedo tactics are transparent. How could he? He’s a pedophile, and pedophiles are stupid that way.
When danyboy attempted to comment here on AZ, I was enraged. I recognize him for what he is. He’s more than just an online pedophile activist. He’s more than just another nodding pedo head saying cognitively distorted things. He’s a real man…….and he’s determined. Just like his pedo-brethren he recognizes no boundaries. He won’t take NO for an answer. Sound familiar? Would you trust a child in this mans presence?
Daniel recently decided to embark upon a campaign of harassment here on AZ. There was a bit of ‘back and forth’ and Daniel started to get angry. He can’t quite figure out what’s going on around him …. and yet he thinks he’s the voice of intelligence. Speaking of intelligence….he had this to say:
Stitches is you, dreamer! She isn’t fucking violet, llort or rez as far as I know. But she is also someone else quite removed from AZ, too.You see, there’s been a bit of intelligence going around regarding both of you, dreamer / stitches. Then you both pull all the archives from your almost identical your blogs at the same time! Wouldn’t it be nice if someone was to even bother leaking that intelligence?
Well, here you go danyboy, I’ll save you the trouble of spreading your *ahem* intelligence around. Let’s just put it here for everyone to see, shall we? This is an email that Daydreamer of Oz recently received. Interestingly enough the IP address of the sender is identical to the one belonging to Daniel Lievre.
January 5, 2007
BoyChat’s Plan
It should come as no surprise to anyone here that pedophiles hate us. That pedophiles want all “antis” out of the way. But doggone it those nitwits even talk about it in public! Oh yeah! They’re making plans….
We’ve already seen Xanadu threaten AZ’ers with his .44 and BillEVans and Dididiot Didaskalos’ veiled threats. But now Xanadu is back! He says “I want to HURT the antis, but I’m not sure how”. And boy does he get some suggestions and offers for help. There are some real doozies here, folks.
The best way is to simply ignore them. 98% of the traffic on their pathetic blogs is from pedos checking to see what they are up to. Frankly, who cares?
I believe Bill Evans cared, until we sent him running back to pedochat. He must try to save face you know.
doesn’t seem to be much activity lately at the iluv2surf site. Perhaps they started to see the downside of upsetting people like me
People like you? Slvrspun the convicted pedofreak who stalked a little boy and makes occasional threats towards everyone in the justice system. Slvrspun thinks pedos should set loose a ‘plague’ to kill the antis as a form of terrorism.
either they or their employers have a business in a competitive market, for instance… not to mention the time-honored tradition of assasination, which can be pulled off fairly safely and efficiently.
Well, I suppose that’s one way. JD encourages taking a deep breath and trying to make the world a better place by reaching out to those less fortunate……and THEN
…and when you have done these things – if you still want to kill people after that, at least you’ll be doing it as part of a healthy and balanced life… and that is not at all a bad thing.
Sure, JD, that’s not a bad thing at all, as long as you’re balancing your violence towards society with your tender mercy for little children. Right.
d says:
The desire to HURT someone for the sake of HURTing them is sadism.
On the other hand, feelings motivated by vengeance are perfectly normal.
Is that right? vengeance/normal. hmm
Kosh:
Homicide is not the solution in promoting an agenda that claims to be about love, consent, and toleration and has as a primary goal to dissolution of link in the public’s mind between pedophilia and psychopathic behavior. Engaging in violence will do nothing but prove to our detractors that we are exactly what they say we are, and will destroy any possibility of sympathy
Kosh tried to calm them down but…..
Santi goes psycho:
Suppose that you know where the Peej homo lives. You go, torch the house, put a machine gun outside and shoot down everything coming from the house in fire, including animals and children. By tomorrow, the news would be “Boylovers kill justice maker Peej homo & family”.I think we have enough strenght in our hands to hold the helm. Besides, crossing the border from north to south is not that difficult
And Fey tries to help clarify:
Are you saying that such an action (killing PeeJ) is a bad thing to be avoided or that we should all say, “To hell with it” kill them and run to Mexico?
Santi replies:
I advice you to start learning Spanish and liking Mexican food
And Tyler tries to fix it by deleting the comments:
Santi, it was pretty clear to me that you were advocating a course of action that is illegal. Fey gave you a chance to make the meaning more clear; you let him know you meant what you said.Do not advocate illegal acts.
Sorry dude, but I’ve already got my screenshots.
Let’s wind it all up with Vespucci (the man who had never loved a boy before)
“Legitimize Boylove”
Oh yeah right, how could I forget that one eh? They want us to be sure that we understand that the solution to everything is to abolish AOC laws. They even state boldly that they won’t molest our children anymore if we’ll give them the right to have sex with our children.
Well, hey guys, that’s ok, plan your plans, talk your talk. Lots of eyes are on you.
In more ways than one.
December 12, 2006
Pedo Logic Puzzle
One day I noticed that we were getting a lot of visitors to AZ through a Google search for the term Pedo Logic. At first I thought it rather strange but then I realized that none of us understand pedofreaks logic, probably even they don’t understand it. So I thought we’d talk a bit about Pedo Logic and what it really is.
We all realize these guys are missing something, we don’t understand why they can’t comprehend and accept basic concepts. So, I figure it’s like this. They can’t accept that they are wacko, because they build these scenarios up in their heads, they say to themselves “I WANT IT and I will talk myself into circles until I find a way to make it fit. I will FORCE it to make sense SOMEHOW!” Which is where the nodding pedo heads come in. (HT to Jacey!) They don’t really care if it makes sense, or if it’s accurate, or if it’s true, they just agree if someone says something that they want to be true.
So what does Pedo Logic look like? I’m going to give you three examples.
Sample Pedo Logic #1
A perving on kiddies housekeeper, he’s got a thing for the daughter of his employers. When the boss is away … the perv comes out to play. He starts by invading the little girls space. He goes through her room, he touches her belongings, he strips her of her privacy. He gets bolder and bolder, he starts to sniff her panties. He steals her panties. He becomes obsessed. He stops doing his job and just hangs out in her room. The little girl is unaware of this. In fact this little girl is even unaware of the birds and the bees, she likes her Barbies and her Dora the Explorer. She likes Saturday cartoons and Disney movies. She’s just a kid, she gets to be carefree that way. But the perving on kiddies dude, sees her smile at him. And he’s spent so much time in her space, with her underwear, fantasizing about her, wanting her that well he just doesn’t see this as an innocent smile. NO NO What we’ve got here is a 5 year old girl who wants to get in his pants.WA LA Pedo Logic.
Sample Pedo Logic #2
The little girl is playing, oh maybe doing some back flips or some such as that. Sometimes her panties show, or her blouse flips up. She doesn’t even notice it. She’s just this carefree kid, playing her game. But she looks up with the little girl face – the only face she has – she’s happy, she’s smiling, laughing, innocent. But the person watching her isn’t like normal men. No, he’s a perverted piece of shit who views the world through a distorted pedo-lens. What have we got? A 5 year old flashing him, because she wants sex with him.WA LA Pedo Logic.
Sample Pedo Logic #3
Here we have a typical freakopath. He has 14 apples, 33 oranges, 65 grapes, 8 pineapples and 6 bananas. He adds them altogether. Divides by 7 cups of coffee, multiplies by 3 sodas, and subtracts 2 beers. What has he got? A 5 year old girl who wants to play with his genitals.WA LA Pedo Logic.
So… now you know about PedoLogic. Please leave the samples you’ve run across in the comments!
For The Completely Mindless
*cross-posted from Daydreamer of Oz
Paedophiles are notorious for making blatantly stupid allegations rather than an actual argument. The most recent example of this is the infantile claim that the fairy in the artwork on Daydreamer of Oz is a child. The first allegation was made here by Didaskalos who says:
Though why anyone who was trying to project an “anti-ped” image would feature a naked 12-year old girl-elf on their homepage is beyond me.
Well like all paedo lies, it spread like wildfire. Psychotic Bill Evans decided to jump on the bandwagon and rant and rave at BoyChat about the image. He goes even farther than Didaskalos, claiming that the fairy is 8. Even when a fellow paedophile tells him he’s wrong, he continues:
The physical proportions…
of an 8 y/o are quite different to an adult in the length of the torso, limbs and head size. The proportions of the female in that sketch are much closer to those of an 8 y/o than those of an adult. Probably sub-conciously so, but still those proportions would tend to draw the eye of a CL considerably more than of a “normal”. The “boobie” could even be the right hand, and not a boobie at all…
As an attempted swipe at me, these comments do not concern me in the least. However, the creator of this artwork – Selina Fenech – is an amazing artist who does not deserve to have her work slandered and misinterpreted in this way.
Therefore, I contacted Selina and alerted her to this issue. The title of this piece of work is Rockabye in the Treetops and can be found in Selina’s gallery here.
Reproduced with permission, is Selina’s response to these allegations:
The artwork Rockabye in the Treetops is definately, and I think quite clearly, not a child. I don’t generally age my fairies, but if I had to
I’d say she was no less than 17-18 human years old, which is in fact the age I was when I drew this artwork.
Now would you paedophiles please stop making me prove you wrong? I’ve got a lot of packing to do.
And Bill – those libel laws that you’re so fond of and clearly don’t understand – I’d um steer clear of them if I were you.
December 7, 2006
"I am NOT a SEX OFFENDER"
According to Hulann and so beautifully outted by Iluv2surf. I do believe we need to talk more about this. You see, Hulann states:
It’s true that I was convicted in 1994 of Aggrivated Criminal Sexual Abuse for Masterbating in front of a 10-year-old boy my Y.F. at the time- The cops had nothing on me until I myself volunteered the information in a police interview which lead to the only evidence they had on me. Such a dumb person I was then by not retaining a lawyer for the police questioning and thinking that the boy would tell all or they would keep at him until he did – He told nothing as I later found out but too late for me to take back my words.I was sentenced to 2 years probation and ordered to undergo Therapy for Sex Offenders…
this post insn’t about the Suicide attempts made durring the 5.5 years of Therapy this post is to state why I am not a SEX OFFENDER.
the thearpist wanted it to be drilled into us that the term SEX OFFENDER is only a label that one can not change but a person that has SEXUALLY OFFENDED OTHERS can change because it describes an act that a person can change and doesn’t place Label on that person that he can not escape from.
Well I reckon that’s applicable to lots of people, eh? Scott Peterson wasn’t a murderer!!! Hey Hey! He was just a person who murdered his wife and unborn baby!!!! Kenneth Lay wasn’t a thief!!! Oh no, he was just someone who stole from others! And doggone it, even Ted Bundy wasn’t a rapist! He just raped women and girls. John Couey wasn’t a child molester! He was just a man who molested children. Dear God, we could go on and on. This is brilliant! The ultimate PC criminal lingo!
Wonder what the nodding pedo heads have to say about it?
grahamsworld:
Your life was totally ruined and turned into a living nightmare for an act which was certainly a victimless crime.Parents and caregivers who physically abuse their children, who beat them, neglect them, starve them, isolate them and turn them into angry, rebellious teenagers are tolerated by Society and the Law, yet a harmless act like this is given penalties harsher than some convicted of manslaughter receive.
2 years probation? Ok.
Nickless:
This is why I don’t give a damn…about people, society, others, “humans in general”. Most people would condemn you, Hulann, even now. I choose to condemn your condemners. What you have gone through, I can only imagine. I try to picture myself in your past situation, in the bowels of the “justice” system; and all I see is a rage so vast that the murder and mayhem that would follow is unspeakable.
hangtwenty:
…I have no idea where you are exactly, but if your case hinges on the word of one person against your word..without any other witnesses or charges…. then any decent lawyer should get you off..!
apollo11:
Reading posts like this really make me angry.Especially when you consider everything you went through that changed you’re entire life around (one might say for the worst) just because you wanked off in front of a kid.
So friggin what? Think about it… You masturbated in front of a kid and you get all that
Hulann:
I didn’t go into to it yet but another part of that Group session greeting besides saying You have SEXUALLY OFFENDED OTHERS was to talk about how if not stoped the possibility of Escalation of abuse.Yes, I can say 100 percent I wanted things between me and the 10 year-old to go further and it prob. would have
Here’s an idea. You can call an apple an orange, but guess what? It’s still an apple and a pedovore is still a pedovore whether you call them pedophile, MAA, or childlover. Heck, I reckon you could call them oranges too if you wanted. Why don’t you start a campaign…. Here’s a slogan you can use
We aren’t child molesters.
We have just molested children.
December 4, 2006
Stoopid Pedophile Tricks
“Your Honor…. I was forced to molest those two young girls because of my wife’s excessive Bingo habit. She was never home, so I had to look elsewhere for lovin’.”
What a load of crap.
I wish I was making that up, because it sounds like a comedy routine. Can you see it now? Leno, or Robin Williams, or Dave Chappelle, standing in front of an audience, doing a bit about something like this? Sometimes, life really is stranger than fiction. Floyd, I hope you get your just rewards in prison… bitch.
