"I’m watching you, little girl"

I’m referring to Joshua Kistler the 31 year old pervert recently sentenced to 24 years in prison for his online predatory behavior. What did he do?

First he posed as a 15 year old boy using images of his own son. He sent those pictures and videos to young girls and claimed to be dying of Leukemia….all to entice them into sending him sexually explicit pictures of themselves. The girls ranged in age from 12-14.

On March 11, 2005, FBI agents in Portland served a search warrant on defendant’s residence, recovering numerous CD’s and two computers that the defendant admitted to containing files of movies of young women in various states of undress, some of which were taken and recorded without their knowledge. In addition, a forensic examination revealed thousands of images containing depictions of child pornography.But hey, it gets worse.

He had a program which had recorded the girls on their web cams without their knowledge and he saved the videos.

He stated that he’d “always been a collector”

As part of his plea deal he gave agents detailed information about the software he used to view and record webcam video without alerting the person with whom he was sharing a connection, software designed to simulate reciprocal webcam video for the purpose of deceiving those minors with whom he was chatting.

This was eerily similar in a way to the case of the stolen panties except that the creep factor on this guy is off the scale. I suppose it should come as no surprise. We have no doubt that guys like this have no respect for others, including the little girls they claim to just love. Interesting that this guy made the comment

“I’m sorry for the harm I’ve caused,” he said. “I wasn’t aware I was causing any harm.”

I found that interesting. And especially when you take into consideration pervert attacks on any law against their behavior. They don’t like the idea that their privacy might be invaded. But the privacy of these young girls meant nothing. Just like their psychological well-being meant nothing. In fact none of the girls meant anything at all to this man except as a means to achieve sexual gratification. So what makes him different than these other guys? He got caught. That’s the only difference.

Now what do the pedofreaks think about this?

Apple

believes its an over reaction on the girls part…. obviously he shouldn’t have been so sneaky but 24 years in prison seems an excessive sentence

Mediapunk

You can only be charged with possession of child pornography. It is not illegal to look at it or view it on a web cam. To my knowledge, there are no laws barring sexual type talk with minors

Infinity:

The first amendment simply does not apply anymore, free speech does not legally exist in the United States anymore

Patrick Kiernan of the FBI Internet Crimes Taskforce says:

“You wouldn’t invite a stranger into your house, or into your bedroom. Don’t let your computer do the same thing.”

Some recommended steps to help protect your child from this sort of thing include:

• do not let your children have computers in their rooms; put them in open rooms only

• keep your computer turned off when you aren’t using it, and if you have a webcam, turn it to the wall when you are not using it, or at least obstruct the view

• purchase your children an email account instead of having them use a free one.

These men have one thing on their minds……..and it’s not the well-being of your child. I believe we’ll be seeing more cases like this. We should all warn everyone of this danger. This man, like so many of these online pedofreaks we see, simply has no soul.

Jack’s Back

We talked about pedophile Jack McClellan and his pedophile website recently HERE and HERE

Jack has his site back up and running, and guess what folks? He’s right back to perving on kiddies. Hanging out at local events, taking pictures of other peoples children…..without their knowledge or permission. Ask Sabrina…this is one upset mother. Who can blame her? She has a message for Jack

“Stop, or else!”

Jack, just like Lindsay Ashford claims he’s just exercising his first amendment rights. He sees nothing wrong with the contempt he’s showing society. He’s going to push, push, push the issue. It matters not to him that Sabrina doesn’t want her daughter on a stinking pedophile’s website. To Sabrina I say You Go Girl and to Jack I say There’s more than one way to skin a cat Jack.

You and your cohorts show absolutely no common decency or respect for society in general. Why the hell do you think we should show you any?

Now State Senator Val Stevens is drafting legislation to be introduced in the next session to make this website illegal in Washington….and hopefully to be expanded later to the Federal level. Who knows, before this is over we might get this sort of thing going in far off places, say places like oh maybe Canada or how about the Netherlands? It’s amazing what you can accomplish with a little elbow grease and a lot of determination.

Jack McClellan doesn’t deserve respect. Lindsay Ashford doesn’t deserve respect. These scornful men are manipulative child predators. And we don’t take that lightly. Not at all. We’ve been huffing and puffing so far, but now a harsh wind has begun to blow. Listen guys, can you hear it? It sounds to me like the Anti’s are coming.

This is going to take time, and they may win little skirmishes along the way, but in the end we will win the war. And that war will be decisive. Monitor yourselves, control yourselves, understand what is acceptable behavior…..because if you don’t, someone will surely do it for you. This is our children’s safety that’s at stake, and we don’t compromise when it comes to that. So, keep watching. Are you watching, Jack?

Searching for a Nanny? Read This

There’s an extremely stupid pedophile you may know by the name of Emovocals. He’s pro adult/child sex. He promotes the abolishment of age of consent laws. He also has a very dangerous profession….for a pedophile. You see Donald Shepherd is a nanny. Yes, a live in nanny.

I’m not quite sure if Donald prefers boys or girls. But I am quite sure that he likes them both. He talks on GirlChat about liking little girls but not women. On BoyChat he talks about liking little boys. And on Men4SexNow dot com he advertised for a man. Specifically a date for his 21st birthday on 9/11. He gave his stats, size, weight,penis size (poor Donald), the fact that he’s a cross-dresser and posts a nice pic too.
In Multiple paraphiliac diagnoses among sex offenders Gene Abel shows that the pedophile with multiple paraphilias, poses a greater risk to society. For example a person with exhibitionism but no other deviances has less chance of committing a crime than an exhibitionist who is also a voyeur who in turn poses less risk than an exhibitionist cross-dressing voyeur with pedophilia. ETC

Iluv2surf was responsible for outting Donald Shepherd aka Emovocals. Read full story HERE. Now Donald has discovered that his real name…his outting shows up high in a google search and number one as a search for Emovocals. Let’s help him move on up the list shall we?

Donald Shepherd went to the pedo chats and asked to cancel his membership. He requested that all his old comments be deleted. BoyChat says it can’t be done but deletes his request. GirlChat says it can’t be done but discusses it with him.

Todd Nickerson:

I suspected you were heading in a dangerous direction the last time we spoke on the phone, but it was my understanding that you were getting help

Infinity:

You have been very careless with alot of things in the past Emo, especially your own personal security and safety…but, that’s kind of moot now.

BB:

My advice to you on your current situation is to flat-out deny that the pedophile “Donald Shepherd” is you.

Emovocals:

I discovered that my legal name is linked GC and BC, and being a Nanny I can’t have that. That and that fuck with his forum and my Name being all over it. With pictures and all that. Fucked me over big time. All one has to do is Type my name in a Google search and that’s the first thing that pops up. I am fucked big time. There is nothing I can do really.

I don’t know how many families would actually do that, but if they do. They will find out that I am a pedophile. How would I denie such a thing. Tell them I was just acting or something?

Febri-chan gets righteous:

why would anyone deny being a paedophile?
I don’t understand, are you trying to say that being a paedophile is something to be denied???

Which is really strange since the entire pedophile community talks incessantly about the dangers of coming out of the toybox. What’s even stranger is what he’s told when he worries about being able to get another job as a live-in nanny.

Febri-chan:

all you need do is tell them that that sort of questioning is not permissible in interviews for employment.

It’s illegal for them to ask whether you’re straight, gay, ped, or bi

This is pretty simple. Our children are in our care, until such time as they are able to adequately care for themselves….at which time you freaks wouldn’t be interested in them anymore anyway. Those parents have a right to know who they are trusting to care for their children.

Febri-chan continues:

The misopaedes are cowards and seldom take any direct action…. If they did, we may actually have a chance at dialogue, but because they are deathly afraid of what we stand for(and most of all, terrified of the voracious truth which is on our side), and know that our rationality and clear-headedness will always conquer their paranoia and prejudice, they will not risk any sort of real debate with us.

Clearheaded. Rational. Ok. I thought this might be a good time to think about what an Anti/Pedo debate looks like.

Pedofreak: Pedophiles DO NOT molest children. Pedophiles LOVE children. Ken Lanning of the FBI says 90% of molestations are committed by non-pedos.

Anti: Well, actually Mr. Pedohead, Ken Lanning did NOT say that. He said it was important to know which type of pedophile you were dealing with so you would know where to find his other victims.

Pedofreak: Runs away to BC or GC screaming “You just can’t debate an anti!!!”

And as for Emovocals, he returned to BoyChat as JonnyXO and told everyone:

Have I got a secret to tell….It’s me E M O— YOu know who. I had to create another nick to get rid of emo. So now ya know.

Yep now we know. Donald Shepherd, live-in nanny, pedophile: GirlLover, BoyLover, cross-dresser, indiscriminately advertises for sex on the internet and goes by the names Emovocals, JonnyXO, Allison, Doodle, Sunrise25, and Kyva. We just want to help you move on up in your Google search position. And hopefully warn any future parents you try to deceive.

The Jack Hunt

Having read Stephen of CrimeSceneBlog’s posts (first and second) on Jack McCellan both at his site and as CrimeBlog.us, I’ve come up with a great idea for Seattle residents. Now, bare with me while I refresh you on the Jack situation.

From CrimeBlogs-

Entitled “Seattle – Tacoma – Everett girl love,” the site offers a listing of events in the Seattle-Tacoma, Washington area where Girl Lovers (referred on the site as GLs) may find large groups of little girls (referred on the site as LGs) to view and photograph.

It would seem that the man who authored the site “Seattle Tacome Everett Girl Love” is not afraid to show his face or give his name in public.

He is Jack McClellan, a 45-year-old male and he appeared on Fox News, along with his name and the title “pedophile.”

Now, in Stephen’s post, he goes on to tell readers that this is the man to be on the lookout for. And, he’s right. People should be watching for this freak. Especially those with children, since he’s not at all hesitant to snap a photo of a child and then display it on his pedophile website.

Now, police have said that this his doing this is perfectly legal. Which makes me wonder just why he is permitted to violate the privacy of uncounted number of children, and then add injury to insult when he publishes them to a website that courts the idea of pedophile- making them a walking target to any half baked nut case that visits his site. Personally, I always thought that inciting a person to commit a crime was illegal. But evidently police in Seattle feel differently.

Which brings me to this point: If Jack McCellan is okay with the idea of strangers snapping photos of strangers and placing them online, then we should return the favor. Parents in Seattle should be actively working to get as many photos of this sick creep as possible out in the public eye- so that we all know what he looks like, and what events he has been attending. Therefore, much like “Where’s Waldo”, I suggest a “Where’s Jack?” contest. Seattle parents are encouraged to look for Jack (pictured above) snap photos of him when he is spotted, and then submit them.

This will not only provide better photos of Jack, but it will assist parents in knowing what events Jack has been at in hopes of spotting their child alone long enough to rub legs with her, or speak to her, or flirt with her. Remember, he likes little girls as young as 3.

Now, in all seriousness, residents of the Seattle area need to be very careful over the next few weekends, as Easter hunts in Seattle will be going on, giving Jack a perfect chance to use these family friendly events in order to prey on children. The Seattle Times has run a list of Easter Egg Hunts in the area, and most likely Jack has already seen this list, and copied it down. So, be extra cautious while attending any of these events with your children.

Good Old Liberal Seattle

Seattle-Area Pedophile Has ‘How-to’ Web Site for Men Seeking Little Girl Activities

From Fox News:

SEATTLE — A Web site created by a pedophile is a virtual “how-to” manual, complete with the best places in western Washington state to see little girls, and tips on how to avoid getting caught by the police.

The site, titled “Seattle-Tacoma-Everett Girl Love,” has been around for a few years. The police know all about it, yet they say they can’t shut it down because the site is legal.

“As disturbing and offensive as we find this, there’s no evidence of a crime, or even suspicion of illegal activity,” said Rebecca Hover of the Snohomish County Sheriff’s Department.

The man who runs it, 45-year-old Jack McClellan, has never been convicted of a sex crime, which means he can attend any family-friendly events where children are present, and take all the pictures he wants for his Web site. He also lives close to a school bus stop.

McClellan says his purpose is to promote association, friendship and legal, consensual hugging and cuddling between men and pre-pubescent girls. He admitted to FOX News that his “age of attraction” is between 3 and 11 years old.

Isn’t it odd how, once again, the issue is quantified by SPFs (Sick Pedo Fucks) as “love.” Not “tool,” as is more accurate. A tool towards an orgasm.

But gosh, it only gets better and more detailed:

McClellan wants to bring pedophiles out of the closet and give them a way to get some relief, by going out and being around little girls. He suggests a number of places, such as plays at elementary schools, parks, swimming pools and libraries.

How’d you like the situation if this involved your daughter:

Parents are understandably outraged. FOX News spoke to the mother of an 8-year-old girl whose picture appeared on the Web site. The picture was taken at a dance recital.

“I needed to get those pictures off of there. I didn’t want the pedophile community having any visibility to my daughter or her friends or any of the children that were on that site,” said parent Ann Cialoa. “Whether it’s a physical threat, a perceived threat, whatever threat it is. It’s our jobs as parents to protect our kids from threats, and he is a threat, and people like him are a threat.”

Gents, all I can say is “keep it up.” Besides the law enforcement authorities, you’re going to have parents going “Ellie Nessler” on you and, to that, I say “more power to them.”

Oh. One more thing. The website magically, mysteriously seems to be “down.”

Shucky-darn!

BZ

The Obligation

The shocking death of 6-year-old Christopher Barrios was covered here. The horrific nature of his untimely death has sent many of us into pensive contemplation. Utter devastation is the only way to describe it. We have shed many tears for Christopher and his family. I have shared these emotions with many of you and know the mutual rage we feel against these paedophiles who commit atrocities against our children on a daily basis.

No child should have to suffer or die at the hands of a paedophile the way Christopher did. Christopher’s death should serve as the impetus for us to take note of a very important fact:

His death was avoidable.

The Edenfields should never have been close enough to Christopher to make their evil move. Indeed, this article will astound you when you realize just how many people knew how dangerous the Edenfields were…..and yet inexplicably did nothing about it.

Neighbours, landlords, district attorneys and judges just to name a few.

The paedophiles themselves tell us that they specifically target and prey upon disadvantaged families. Bill Evans explains:

How many times have you seen posters here talk about having y/fs from happy, loving homes? Those boys don’t need to turn to someone outside the family for support. I have had a couple of y/fs from those sort of homes, but we never had the kind of close friendship I usually develop with kids from dysfunctional familes.

The kids from good homes are just along for the fun, but kids from dysfunctional homes, or no home, want a whole lot more…

Or as Descartes put it:

BLs who have no criminal record can work with boys, but probably not the boys that they would dream of working with. The BLs who have boy-filled lives aren’t taking a bunch of adorable boys on fun camping trips in the woods.

They are working with boys who are extremely poor, who have serious physical and/or emotional problems and who are far from being the object of most BLs’ fantasies.

Thunderchild details the many places he meets boys…church, bike riding events, model railway, boat and aircraft events, and even children of his customers.

I’ve been working with boys since not long after I got out of prison. I’ve had some failures, but I’ve had many more successes.

There’s no gaurded secret to spending time with boys.

I’ve been convicted more than once for BL stuff and even today I spent some time with a boy under the AOC

Meeting boys is easy.

But even more importantly, they rely on our complacency

We must end this complacency

Most of us look at our own children and know that we would do anything to protect them. But what about the disadvantaged little boy down the street? Or the poor little girl on the other side of town? For that matter what about the children half a world away who live as sex slaves to these paedophiles?

Perhaps your proactive attitude to this problem will save your own child. Perhaps you’ll never even know you saved someone. The face you’ll never see; the name you’ll never know. You’re not going to get a thank you….in fact the greatest reward we can possibly ask for is the happy, healthy child unaware and safe from the dangers lurking.

The following is taken from the Preamble to the UN Declaration on the Rights of the Child:

Whereas mankind owes
to the child the best it has to give

Mankind. It does not say relatives or political parties or even religious affiliations. Neither does it say out of the kindness of our hearts.

Mankind owes to the child.

We cannot stop these predators from existing. But we can do everything in our power to stop them from accessing our children or the children across town or the ones on the other side of the world. We need to be vigilant and start delivering to every child what we are obliged to provide for them – a safe place to get off the school bus and play on the swings.

I urge you to join me in making a deep, personal commitment to the protection of all children in our communities….to each day steel your resolve to make your community safe….to not look away

We owe them that much.

What’s the Hurry?

Look at Christopher Michael Barrios, of Brunswick Georgia. Look at his face. Look at that smile. Imagine him in front of you, six years old, how small he would be. 3 feet 6 inches tall and 60 pounds. Just a little boy playing on a swing set after he got off the school bus. Just a couple hundred feet away from home….

….And right across the street from a convicted sex offender.

His funeral was today.

Now let’s walk across the street and see what we find.

Why it’s George Edenfield who pleaded guilty in 1997 to molesting two boys, ages 7 and 9. He was sentenced to 10 years on probation.

As part of his 1997 conviction, George Edenfield had to register as a sex offender in Georgia. A Georgia law passed last year prohibits registered sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school bus stop; the Edenfields lived about 600 feet from the one Christopher waited at. This law has currently been put on hold, pending……

Now let’s see what else is across the street. Living with George we have his father.

David Edenfield. David pleaded guilty to incest in 1994.

Wonder if he also molested George when he was a boy? Enter the mother:

Peggy Edenfield. Not a registered sex offender, but she lied during the search for Christopher. She sent investigators off on wild goose chases….away from Christophers body.

But perhaps she wasn’t trying to cover up what her son did….or what her husband did for that matter. Maybe she was just trying to cover up for the fact that she watched while both her husband and her son molested the boy….Or the fact that she masturbated while watching?

Perhaps it was both. Nevertheless, all three have been arrested and charged with capital murder. Apparently the prosecutor will be seeking the death penalty….and frankly they all three deserve it, no matter which one actually strangled him to death….after getting their thrills. Or perhaps his death was part of the thrill. Of course, if Jessica’s Law had been in effect back in 1997….and George had received the minimum sentence of 25 years, little Christopher would still be alive.

Could anyone argue with that? Well Dissident could. You remember Dissident. The pseudo-pedo philosopher. There was a discussion about Jessica’s Law. And of course…as always..Dissident is opposed to any measure that might punish a pedo. He claims that it won’t prevent real child molestations it will merely punish those involved in consensual sex with children. Well he claims that child murderers should never be let out of prison in the first place so it doesn’t really effect them. But I think he’s missing the point. Is it purposeful?

John Couey was arrested for fondling a child. He served his time. He got out. He progressed….he kidnapped and murdered. George Edenfield was convicted of fondling two little boys. He got probation. No jail time. He progressed….he kidnapped and murdered. Are we seeing a pattern here? These are just two examples of why we need ONE STRIKE LAWS.

Just for the record here are some of the pedo-opinions about legislation like Jessica’s Law… one that would have prevented John Couey, George Edenfield and even Joseph Duncan from progressing:

Vespucci: “What a travesty of justice”

darth: “It is so sad that love has such a heavy punishment’

Santi: “Sex offenders, especially the ones to offend a minor are to pay forever.”

Dissident: “I find it highly insulting that the fears and emotional devastation of a family are used to divert further oppression upon a highly misunderstood minority group”

28: The only way to protect children is to educate them about the differences between child molesters and Pedosexuals….in order to empower children with the comprehensive knowledge they need, in order to make good decisions when confronted with potential exploitation.”

Lux: “For every one dangerous-to-children molester, there are a thousand harmless sex offenders”

Hierophant: “These are not anti molester laws….these are anti love laws.”

Turtle: “New laws won’t stop scumbags from raping children. They will just ruin more men and womens lives and continue to tear families apart.”

LGsinmyheart: “I would chop my feet off, bracelet included (speaking of tracking device), give the bracelet away as a present to a little girl….just to prove a point”

Well, you made your point LGsinmyheart. You sure did. Nothing will stop you will it? Not as long as you have your freedom anyway.

Judge Daniel L. Howsare

I know this isn’t about online pedophiles, but I’m cross posting in it hopes of getting the word out, and hopefully forcing the judge to do his job.

Imagine if you will, that your boyfriend preys upon your daughter for five years. She suffers in silence, as so many children do, until one day when she speaks up. After five years of sexual abuse, she’s gained the strength to tell of the abuse she’s went through and seek justice.

Your boyfriend, Richard Crawford is convicted of 390 counts of sexual abuse, with almost a hundred carrying mandatory five year sentencing. You can sit back, and focus on helping your child overcome this. She can breath easier, knowing that this man will never hurt her, or another child again. Because time has went by, and the abuse is hard to prove- the investigation takes it’s toll on her, requiring her to go through not only the telling of the abuse, but even the extent that she wears a wire and gets him to admit to the abuse. But, after everything- it’s over. He’s been convicted. You know, as does your little girl, that he will be spending the rest of his life in jail.

And, then, the unthinkable happens. The judge in the case, Judge Daniel L. Howsare decides that he’s just not sure about sentencing. He just can’t make up his mind on whether Crawford is punishable under Megan’s law.

Just to give you an idea of Crawford’s charges, just so that you can see the sort of man we are talking about, here is the current criminal charges filed against him, for which he is waiting sentencing on. Included in his charges are 18§3121§§6 – 53 / Rape / Person Less Than 13 Years Age, and 18§3126§§A7 Ind Asslt Person Less 13 Yrs Age- both listed more times than I care to count.

Megan’s law lists those as:

Rape (18 Pa. C.S. § 3121)
(a) Offense defined – A person commits a felony of the first degree when the person engages in sexual intercourse with a complainant:

1. By forcible compulsion;
2. By threat of forcible compulsion that would prevent resistance by a person of reasonable resolution;
3. Who is unconscious or where the person knows that the complainant is unaware that the sexual intercourse is occurring;
4. Where the person has substantially impaired the complainant’s power to appraise or control his or her conduct by administering or employing, without the knowledge of the complainant, drugs, intoxicants, or other means for the purpose of preventing resistance; or
5. Who suffers from a mental disability which renders the complainant incapable of consent.

(c) Rape of a Child – A person commits a felony of the first degree when the person engages in sexual intercourse with a complainant who is less than 13 years of age.

and

Indecent Assault (18 Pa. C.S. § 3126) – if the offense is a misdemeanor of the first degree or greater
A person who has indecent contact with the complainant or causes the complainant to have indecent contact with the person.

Both are crimes that are SEXUAL OFFENSES as declared by Megan’s Law.

Currently, despite having been convicted of 390 sexual offenses, Richard Crawford is not on PA’s sexual offender list. Despite being convicted of 390 sexual offenses, Richard Crawford is not sitting in jail. Because the judge doesn’t find it important to remove this man from walking the streets freely.

Richard Crawford is out on bond until the judge in this case decides that he has put enough children as risk, and sentences Crawford. Yet, despite the high likelihood that Crawford could skip out, or that he could decide to prey upon one more child- liberal Judge Daniel L. Howsare won’t even set a date for sentencing.

Bedford County District Attorney Bill Higgins, did his job. He presented his case, and won a conviction. And now he’s asking the the judge do his job, and sentence Crawford.

WJAC 6 News Richard Crawford molested his ex-girlfriend’s daughter for five years, from the time she was 7-years-old until she was 12. Despite his conviction last December, the victim still does not have justice.

Higgins said he blames the judge.

“Here’s an opportunity to take a violent sex offender off the street and the judge doesn’t take the opportunity to do that and lets him walk out of the courtroom,” said Higgins.

Howsare refused to comment about his decision, but Higgins said it’s because Howsare isn’t sure if Crawford is really a sexually violent predator. For the state, there’s no question.

“The state offender association board has determined he is a sexually violent predator,” said Higgins. “We just need the court to go along with that.”

There is more coming out in this story, and I’m hoping to be able to bring you new information within the next few days- on both the case and this irresponsible judge.

For now, I have to ask that you take a moment to make a few phone calls- and let the Bedford County Court know that allowing a sexual predator to remain free (it’s been three months) while a judge refuses to do his job, is just not acceptable.

Judge Daniel L. Howsare
President Judge

Courtroom No. 1
Courthouse Annex
Juliana Street
Bedford PA 15522
Phone: (814) 623-4810
Fax: (814)623-3858

At this point, a child has been horribly abused, and her abuser is being allowed to roam free. We have to demand that not only he be sentenced, but that the sentence be set at the maximum allowed by law. This child suffered for five years at the hands of this predator- we can not allow her to suffer now, at the hands of this judge.

Unsympathetic

Let me state this up front: I am a convert, from agnostic to a believer. I believe in God, in Good and Evil. But I feel I have to write about this turn of events from an unsympathetic viewpoint.

From The Sierra Times:

SAN DIEGO – The Roman Catholic Diocese of San Diego said Tuesday that it planned to file for bankruptcy protection to put off going to trial in more than 140 lawsuits alleging sexual abuse by priests.

When I worked Child Abuse for a major California law enforcement agency I had the prime suspect in one of my cases “disappeared” and moved from the local diocese. I was not at all pleased. Additionally, at the time, I was told to drop the case and move on with others.

Wrong is wrong, and Evil is Evil, no matter the robe or uniform or inclination. I am fresh out of sympathy when I read of this turn of events.

BZ

Poor Wittle Ashford Gots His Feelings Hurted

It seems that I may have recently started something, and that in doing so I’ve offended the high pedophile whack job Lindsay Ashord. Don’t worry, I’m not about to be upset that the little wiener is complaining and making a fuse just because someone is a little tired of him abusing the world wide web by publishing his tripe accounts of how horrible the rest of the world is for not letting him legally rape little girls.

Months ago I mentioned at my place that Ashford had decided to play political pundit by using his sexual arousal as a means of picking the man whose children he’d most like to see growing up in the White House.

I was rather disappointed with the slow reaction time to this matter on behalf of a great many political leaders, and had recently mentioned it again. The matter really heated up when *someone* decided to point out on the Obama blogs that Ashford was up to his tricks again.

Seems that suddenly, people were worried, and worried enough that they sent this letter to Ashford.

The only thing I can say is: “Good for you Obama. I may hate your politics, and I may swear on my life that you’ll never have my vote… but on this subject alone, and on this particular action, you have my respect. As long as you follow through that is.”

Of course, Ashford in his usual whining ranting isn’t as happy about this little development, and is pleading his rights to freedom of speech:

You may also remember that my nemesis, the lovely Lilo, as well as some other bloggers got very upset about the post and wrote all sorts of humourous things as a result. In fact, intrepid Lilo even went so far as to telephone the offices of several of the politicians mentioned to tell them of the blog post. Much to her surprise, none of them did anything! Undeterred, Lilo has brought up the whole thing again. It appears that this time around, somebody, somewhere, listened. Yesterday, this website received a letter from Robert Bauer of the law Perkins Coie, who represent Obama for America demanding that the pictures be taken down. Not only that, Bauer demanded that I remove any mention of Obama or his family from the website, as well as any links to Obama’s website.

First off, despite the fact that I really am rather lovely- I’d think I was a little out of Ashfords league, seeing how I can defend myself against sexual predators such as himself, and I’ve already surpassed his level (or lack of) intelligence. But that’s beside the point.

More importantly, Ashford is forgetting a very important little detail- as much as he likes to throw around the right to freedom of speech as granted by the US Constitution, he should be looking at other laws we have here, that aren’t so favorable to “his kind”. Such as the Child Protection act of 2003 (also known as the PROTECT ACT:

The Child Protect Act passed in 2003 gives U.S. law enforcement greater authority to pursue sexual predators across borders. It authorizes a penalty of up to 30 years in prison for U.S. citizens engaged in an act of child sexual exploitation, even if it occurs in another country.

Ashford states that I’m “undeterred”, and he’s right. I’ll continue to be here, continue to insist that our leaders protect our children from the likes of scum like him.